Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies

HeroMarine
HeroMarine
Even if we are talking about a cryptocracy, there has to be some kind of front-facing structure, and that does not exist. It’s a trope to say that “politicians are puppets,” but puppets implies a puppet master, and the puppet master presently appears to be absent totally.
HeroMarine
HeroMarine
You have Jews and other special interests, you have corporations and billionaires, but it appears to be more of a feeding frenzy than an organized structure with a clear end goal.
Kalarion
Kalarion
I actually think that's part of its strength. I wouldn't call the so-called "NWO" leaderless, but it has completely internalized the modern Western love of decentralization. I wrote a post in the RU/UA war thread that touches on the subject here.
Kalarion
Kalarion
In that sense I think of it as functioning similar to Adam Smith's free market - everyone makes complex decisions individually with the same end-state in mind, thus causing the complex to shift the society/government/culture/what-have-you in one direction or another, as a mass.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom