Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Lords of Xulima II Development Update: Open World and Random Encounter Design

Crooked Bee

(no longer) a wide-wandering bee
Patron
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
15,048
Location
In quarantine
Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire MCA Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Tags: Lords of Xulima II; Numantian Games

Remember the isometric-meets-first person RPG Lords of Xulima? As you may be aware, Numantian Games recently announced their new, smaller game, which they said will not be a Xulima sequel. At the same time, the sequel is in the plans too, and the team is currently laying the design foundations for it -- and the new development update is just about that.

In it, the team ruminates on open world vs. more linear world design and whether to include artificial exploration barriers in the sequel, as well as the question of random encounters vs. clearing out the area. Here's the part on improving the world openness in the sequel:

In Lord of Xulima, the world was open in essence. From the beginning, you could go wherever you wished. Of course, you could die very easily, adventuring yourself into too dangerous regions. However, we set some few specific barriers in several places mostly in the first part of the game.

There were two types of barriers, ones that were only powerful guardians like the army of the impious princes that protected certain regions. Those barriers weren’t impossible to beat without triggering the events that removed them (killing the corresponding prince) if you had a very powerful party. The other barriers were fixed and impossible to beat until you got special items or did specific things. For example, the Ulnalum Guardian that prevented to enter in Varaskel or the Yul statue in Rasmura that protected the bridge access with a halo of darkness.

We set those barriers for two reasons. First the story, the story was more coherent if the main story dialog was played in its natural order. Second, it was to avoid the player from getting lost too soon. In LoX’s earliest version, we first tested with no barriers at all. The testers wasted a lot of time trying to figure out where to go, what areas they could explore or were too dangerous. Ultimately, they became frustrated very quickly. In contrast, with those few barriers the world continues to be very open with lots of things to do, the story flows better, and the player is not overwhelmed by so many options at the very beginning.

As with any design decision, this one was sometimes criticized by the most hardcore players and at the same time, the game was too obscure for other players that got lost as soon as they reached Velegarn (indeed, most of them died on the road to Sorrentia; do you remember that lovely ogre?).

As always, it is impossible to please all players, so we will be loyal to the essence of Lords of Xulima and its old-school spirit. For the sequel, we will continue with this philosophy but improve the world openness as much as the story allows us to. The world will again be vast and dangerous. We want the player to explore and experiment without adding artificial barriers. You will be free to roam wherever you wish or your survival sense allows you.​

I'm reading this as "we will remove as many barriers as we can, but also keep them as a design element (and so not make the game completely open-world), both for story reasons and so as to not confuse the player too much". But the wording is still not entirely clear to me, so it remains to see just how open-world they'll want to actually make the sequel.

The post also announces the return of a Cursed Hounds-like special enemy for the sequel. Check it out in full here.
 

himmy

Arcane
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Messages
1,151
Location
New Europe
random encounters vs. clearing out the area.

Although I thought I was going to hate it, the area cleaning skit actually grew on me and it made for a novel gaming mechanic for me* so I would definitely want to see it again in the next game.


*I'm sure there's going to be people telling me that their favourite 1986 blobber had that before
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,386
Location
Milan, Italy
Lord of Xulima was a weird mix for me. There were parts of the game that I loved and others that I absolutely loathed.
Some of its best puzzles were part of the former, while the over-reliance on grinding and the questionable skill system definitely examples of the latter.

Oh, and the writing was mostly garbage, frankly.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom