Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Digital News is not impressed with SoU

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,044
Tags: Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide

<a href=http://www.dignews.com>Digital Entertainment News</a> continues reviewing <b>NWN</b> series. We loved their <a href=http://www.rpgcodex.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=3008>review of NWN OC</a> that claimed that NWN <i>retains the turn-based feel of the original pencil-and-dice Dungeons and Dragons game</i>. Well, today we bring to your attention their less enthusiastic <a href=http://www.dignews.com/review.php?story_id=1887>review of SoU</a> that was given only <b>6.2 out of 10</b>
<br>

<br>
<blockquote>While Atari and BioWare have introduced one of the most playable and compelling RPGs in years in the form of Neverwinter Nights, the first expansion pack, Shadows of Undrentide was a mildly disappointing follow-up title. The main reason for this is the short-and-skimpy approach Atari and BioWare took the first time out.
<br>
<br>
Speaking of the Aurora Toolset, my review of Neverwinter Nights tended to lead one to the impression that creating a gameworld was a snap with Aurora. That’s not quite true. While there is more documentation and tutorials and wizards available for the amateur game designer within the Aurora Toolset, making the basic tasks easier, you still need to become something of a rookie programmer to accomplish much in Aurora. </blockquote>
<br>
Can't argue with that. It was a very weak but overpriced expansion. The reviewer still managed to insert some hype by calling it "an extension of the best D&D RPG on PC" though.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Spotted at: <A HREF="http://www.gengamers.com">GenGamers</A>
 

Diogo Ribeiro

Erudite
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
5,706
Location
Lisboa, Portugal
Profeshunal said:
Speaking of the Aurora Toolset, my review of Neverwinter Nights tended to lead one to the impression that creating a gameworld was a snap with Aurora. That’s not quite true. While there is more documentation and tutorials and wizards available for the amateur game designer within the Aurora Toolset, making the basic tasks easier, you still need to become something of a rookie programmer to accomplish much in Aurora.

While its good to know they realized the mistake, its useless now because the damage - or hype - is already done.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom