Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Editorial Why less is more

Monolith

Prophet
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Messages
1,298
Location
München
Tags: Scars of War

<a href="http://scarsofwargame.com">Scars of War</a> developer Naked Ninja/Gareth devoted <a href="http://scarsofwargame.com/DevBlog/?p=347">some thoughts</a> to item and creature design in RPGs, criticizing the quantity over quality approach many of today's game developers follow.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>And these days, most designers have a “more is better!” approach to design. More creatures, more spells, more magic items. If game A has 20 monster types, the sequel needs to have 50! Designers brag that their games have hundreds of thousands of magical items! That’s not something to brag about.
<br>
<br>
These designers fail to grasp their mistake. By adding more, they subtract value from the existing pool or enemies and items. Nothing is special or epic or legendary anymore, none of those buzzwords that people like to throw around.
<br>
<br>
In SoW, I am taking a different approach. Monsters are rare, special, and I hope interesting. And legendary creatures/items are legendary. Which, generally, translates into highly lethal. If people for a league around a cave talk about how dangerous the creature that lives there is, listen to them. I will warn players before instant death encounters, but it’s a warning you can miss or ignore if you want to. <b>So pay attention.</b></blockquote>
<br>
You've got to give me some ritalin first.
<br>
<br>
Discuss!
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <b>Dark_Paladin_Anti_Hero</b>
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
34,350
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Sounds good. I'm sick of "legendary" items being just like that other sword you just found, only with +5 to hit and damage instead of just a simple +2. Meh, legendary my ass.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
I don't have anything against craploads of creatures and items, as long as the distribution curve of their types is slanted heavily towards the lower end of the scale.

Other than that - sounds good, especially the:
"don't go there, %playername, you'll die!"
*%playername ignores advice*
*%playername dies*
part.
 

Durwyn

Prophet
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
1,132
Location
Erewhon
No hordes of orcs/goblins/demons/blightspawn ?? No uber weapons in every barrel ?

fuuuuu.png


UUUUUCK YEAH !
 

Luzur

Good Sir
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
41,926
Location
Swedish Empire
DraQ said:
I don't have anything against craploads of creatures and items, as long as the distribution curve of their types is slanted heavily towards the lower end of the scale.

Other than that - sounds good, especially the:
"don't go there, %playername, you'll die!"
*%playername ignores advice*
*%playername dies*
part.

wont work, lots of console players will return the game complaining its too hard since they can die.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
Luzur said:
DraQ said:
I don't have anything against craploads of creatures and items, as long as the distribution curve of their types is slanted heavily towards the lower end of the scale.

Other than that - sounds good, especially the:
"don't go there, %playername, you'll die!"
*%playername ignores advice*
*%playername dies*
part.

wont work, lots of console players will return the game complaining its too hard since they can die.
We need some retard cleansing.
 

TheMany

Novice
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
15
Copious amounts of fights and items usually ruin RPGs and other genres for me. Unless its a Dungeon hack where that be the main idea, not something the developers try to disguise like in The Witcher.
 

Rhalle

Magister
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
2,192
Unadulterated horseshit.

A transparent excuse to do less.

Monsters and gear are already cloned and recycled. And that's a 'quantity'' approach?
 

Hory

Erudite
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Messages
3,002
What we need is an article about why less blog hyping means more time for actual development.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
He makes it sound like this soemthing new. this pretty much has always been true. It's not a new thing. Moron.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
Perhaps, if the Codex newsposts and the posters would be more original, my responses would also be new.
 

Ahzaruuk

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
1,184
Location
Just a city called Sirius.
Rhalle said:
Unadulterated horseshit.

A transparent excuse to do less.

Monsters and gear are already cloned and recycled. And that's a 'quantity'' approach?
I see it as saying that they want to be more econimical with their game and not make it a loot porn.
 

obediah

Erudite
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,051
less is more, but some distros get a little aggressive with the filters making it less useful as a diagnosis tool.
 

kris

Arcane
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
8,890
Location
Lulea, Sweden
Luzur said:
wont work, lots of console players will return the game complaining its too hard since they can die.

what makes you think they will buy the game to begin with? I mean he have not released a "Sex and violence" trailer even!
 

Andhaira

Arcane
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,869,093
Sounds great. IMO SoW is shaping up to be a fantastic game and a must play for all codexian regulars.
 

shihonage

DEVELOPER
Patron
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
7,181
Location
United States Of Azebarjan
Bubbles In Memoria
I believe less is more when it comes to fleshing out the background of the game. Fallout 1's "less is more" approach was exactly that. They made enough of the world to convince you that it exists, without dumping on you barrels of busy lore and inserting "what Aradesh had for breakfast last night" into his dialogue.
 

Castanova

Prophet
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
2,949
Location
The White Visitation
I don't think "less is more" is really the crux of the issue. The goal is to have items that are unique and give the player pleasure in acquiring. This can be done whether there are 10 items in the game or 10,000. I think "good item design combined with good world/quest design" is the real point.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom