Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review GameSpot has the hots for Fate

Spazmo

Erudite
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
5,752
Location
Monkey Island
Tags: Fate; Wild Tangent

Fate, that plucky indie Diablo clone from Wild Tangent, has been <a href=http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fate/review.html>reviewed</a> by <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/pc">Gamespot PC</a>, who rated it a solid <b>7.9/10</b>, praising its excellent design and fun gameplay.<blockquote>As for the differences between Fate and Diablo, for one thing, Fate doesn't let you choose between different character classes. Instead, you're free to develop your character however you see fit, by bolstering his or her armed combat or magic skills or by whatever combination you like. This system is perhaps a little intimidating for what's otherwise a breezy game, since right off the bat, there are so many places where you could be spending the small number of skill points you gain per level. And as tempting as it may be to spread your skill points across all the different skills that sound interesting, you're probably better off specializing in a small number of compatible abilities--for example, swordfighting and critical strike or spellcasting and attack magic. If you spread your points too far and wide, you'll probably just end up feeling like you're stuck with a weak character. Still, this open-ended system ultimately works well, and the experience of playing a fighter-type character is indeed quite different from playing as a caster. For what it's worth, magic-oriented characters are probably the most interesting, since you can have up to a dozen different spells mapped to your function keys. So you can be summoning creatures to aid you while raining fire and lighting down on your foes. Meanwhile, a fighter character is limited to whaling on his opponents with a weapon.</blockquote>Yup, everyone loves a well-designed classless system.
 

Naked_Lunch

Erudite
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
5,360
Location
Norway, 1967
I was playing this the other day and it just hit me: This game would fucking RAWK if it had multiplayer.

Even without it, it's still a fairly fun and enjoyable game, and most definitely worth buying.
 
Self-Ejected

dojoteef

Self-Ejected
Joined
Oct 26, 2004
Messages
970
It would be great if they could make something like this for the Nintendo DS. They need PC style RPGs for the handhelds!
 

GenericID

Novice
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
3
Does it have co-op? Though from the impression I get from reviews it seems to be more tailored to a solo adventurer.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom