Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Cradle - I, for one, welcome our fembot overlords

JudasIscariot

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
2,001
Location
IV Republic of Polandia
Serpent in the Staglands Codex USB, 2014
silly jumping game with boxes.

Yeah, that jumping game killed the mood for me. I mean I go from wandering around in the Mongolian steppe and then BAM! arcade puzzle time and it's like this for EVERY robot part.
 

Crooked Bee

(no longer) a wide-wandering bee
Patron
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
15,048
Location
In quarantine
Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire MCA Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
RPS review: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/07/29/cradle-review/

Cradle [official site] is a bold, imaginative and shocking piece of science fiction that comes to us in the body of a first-person adventure game. Transhumanism, block-based arcade puzzles, time-consuming object hunts and some of the smartest writing in the medium are waiting out on the steppe. Here’s wot I think.

There’s a lot to unpack here so I’m going to start with the basics.

1) The yurt isn’t the only location but you’re not going to be travelling far. Cradle is akin to the one city block game. Except in a yurt, on the steppe.

2) You can open almost every drawer, pick up and lob almost every object and read every piece of text, from diaries, posters and letters to the words on a packet of sugar. Myst this ain’t.

3) Puzzles mainly involve finding things within the environment. Those things are generally located where you’d expect them to be – cooking things in the cooking area, post-human vessel body parts in the [REDACTED]

Ah, yes. You’re going to spend a lot of time fetching body parts if you play Cradle. There are no squishy bits to handle so don’t worry too much if you’re squeamish but some of the concepts in this wildly imaginative science fiction story are as unnerving as anything you’d expect to find in a horror game. In fact, Cradle is exploring some of the ground that SOMA covers and even though there are no monsters lurking in the dark corners of its world, there are moments far more chilling than anything found in SOMA’s first hours.

The sinister and downright hideous aspects of Cradle’s world are revealed through conversation and documents. Considering the intricate detail and beauty of the locations, the amount of story and setting revealed through telling rather than showing is something of a disappointment. The environment, beautiful and well-crafted as it is, doesn’t tell the story, it contains the story. Up to a point, at least.

When you leave your home, the surrounding area stretches before you like a promise of vastness to explore. Cleverly, developers Flying Cafe have ensured that the land slopes away and then upwards in just such a way that you’re discouraged from heading out on foot. Looking out across the emptiness, it’s hard to imagine it’ll lead to anything other than more of the same – barren beauty beneath painted skies.

There’s only one other place to go, an enormous ruined eggshell of a building, festooned with colourful decorations and with a central approach that once strived to be as impressive as the gardens of Versailles. Within that second location, there are games to play – games within a game that itself interrogates the idea of virtual spaces. It’d be easy to see these arcade-puzzles as padding, required to extend Cradle’s running time to the four or five hours it’s likely to last, but they have their place in the world and its story. And I enjoyed them. Depending on your points of reference, they’re either surrealist short-form Minecraft or intense, free-form first-person Bombuzal.

Whether you see them as a welcome change of pace or an irritating interruption, Cradle’s games are an essential part of the tale it tells. I don’t want to spoil any part of it because the greatest pleasure in the game is found in gradually piecing together your understanding of the world. It starts with the oldest of chestnuts – you don’t know who or why you are – and the blurred line between an old way of life and some very new forms of life. Almost immediately, everything becomes strange. And then a little stranger.

The highest praise I can lavish on any sci-fi story lies in a comparison to the hundreds of books I read in my teen years. They belonged to my dad and he’d collected them over two decades of postal book club membership. There had been little quality control and I had none whatsoever as I worked my way through them, startled by the ideas even when the writing and characterisation was as flimsy as a politician’s promise. Nothing mattered except the imaginative powers that took me from diseased colonies to malignant megacorps and bewildering virtual realities. Everything was possible and I was willing to be convinced that most things were probable.

Cradle is convincing. Even the most terrible and bizarre events and cultural behaviours are credible, drawn from recognisable social and pyschological functions. It’s a game capable of chilling the blood with a single line and expanding the horizons of your imagination with the next. For the bold, intelligent and inventive world-building alone, Cradle deserves an audience. The audience deserves Cradle, in fact. Anyone who felt that Ex Machina just about managed to uncover the tip of an interesting iceberg will be delighted to find that Cradle goes deeper. It’s a different kind of story, right at the very foundation of what its characters actually are, but it’s also quite clearly a kind of science fiction that is vanishingly rare: complex, hard, harrowing and intimidating.

For all of those reasons, I’d urge anyone with an interest in speculative fiction and bold writing in games to play Cradle immediately. Right now. Go on. Or do you want to hear about what I didn’t like before you step onto the steppe? No spoilers ahead but I am going to speak about aspects of the ending that you might want to avoid if you’re already intrigued and happy to go in cold. Skip the next three paragraphs and come back for the conclusion.

I’ve spent a lot of time considering Cradle’s story and reading about the thoughts of other people who have seen it through to the end. It’s abrupt, that ending, and it didn’t work for me at all. Sometimes a poor ending retroactively harms an entire piece of work but that wasn’t the case with Cradle. Instead, the closure (and lack of it) made me realise that I’d enjoyed the world rather than the story. Whatever I feel about the end of the story, I’m still hugely impressed by that world.

The entire game rather cleverly tricked me into thinking I cared about the characters I was spending time with (and as) but the attempt to wrap up their experiences neatly, with a bow on top, demonstrated just how little of the storytelling was about what was happening in and around the yurt. A conclusion to the interesting elements of the story couldn’t possibly work because Cradle’s strengths are in its world-building, which is disguised as a personal tale. The finale does feel rushed, which may be due to a lack of resources, but my lack of attachment to the events of the ending relates to the sudden focus on the specific rather than the global. I am fascinated by the world but I don’t particularly care about the way in which the player character fits into it.

That’s a failure of the writing as well as the voice acting, which seems like an attempt to be part blank slate and part detached non-entity. At times I liked what the voice seemed to imply but on the whole it fell flat. I reckon the whole thing might work better if the acting were in another language – English sounds wrong in the environment anyhow, even if I’m willing to believe it has become the lingua franca of EVERYWHERE in the game’s setting – but there’s no option to play in the original Russian without switching menus and documents to Russian as well. There’s a lack of technical options all round, including y-axis inversion and controller support.

And yet, the world of Cradle is one of the most startling inventions I’ve encountered in any medium. While the methods by which the details of that world are communicated are often simplistic, it’s impossible to overstate how exciting it is to confront a vision of the future that is so carefully constructed, and so full of terrors that have become accepted parts of the scenery. Just as the internet has brought images and conversations that would previously have been impossibly off-limits into the palms and pockets of children, Cradle presents a world in which people accept the most troubling of actions as part of ordinary life.

It’s a wholly believable capsule from a future that is eerily possible. Even more impressive is that there is no reliance on physical violence and enslavement to explain the weird horrors of Cradle’s transhumanism. It’s violence is psychological and cultural, and far more effective than the ugliness that the Robot Lady imagery might lead you to expect. Lord knows, I suffered through enough cyborg sex stories during my years of reading pulpy sci-fi. Cradle’s cruelties are not so obvious and, as social and technological progression shows, those cruelties are often caused by a desire for improvement.

Smart, subtle and sinister, Cradle is a wonderful work of science fiction that doesn’t quite fit inside the space Flying Cafe have designed for it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
795
I can definitely understand frustration with arcade portions. I just got done playing Leisure Suit Larry: Magna Cum Laude. Now, it's really not a "game". It's supposed to be, but it's actually just an excuse to look at polygon boobs and hear some adolescent jokes. The arcade portions ruin the game, given what little there's to enjoy. If they had dramatically eased the pace or raw reflex difficulty of the games, it may have helped, but all that would do is put the focus on the conversations, leading probably to a different direction entirely. In fact, I think that might have been a better direction. One which was focused more on dialog trees and on replaying. I also wnat to add Larry Lovage is a slimeball. I hated htis charcter. So it was hard to accept the game on a moral level. Instead you have to throw morals out the window and just enjoy the jokes and atmosphere (and boobs) in the game.

Wanted to share that because well.... two things:
1) Arcade portions making the game hard to enjoy
2) Girls (girls girls)! (ok I admit Cradle is not really focused on this as much as lsl:mcl)
 
Last edited:

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom