-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
damn you publishers!
- Thread starter Necro
- Start date
Wulfgar
Scholar
I don't think he got the joke.
btw what's "scratchware"?
btw what's "scratchware"?
I guess not.Wulfgar said:
This kind of thing apparently.btw what's "scratchware"?
It's a sensible outlook in many respects.
It does, however, manage to bring its own brand of narrow-mindedness to the party.
For example:
The 2D vs 3D decision should be made on its own merits regardless of the context. Unthinkingly opting for 2D is every bit as narrow-minded as unthinkingly opting for 3D.
"3D games are complex and costly" is a stupid remark in the context. Sure - most current 3D games are costly, just as most current games are. So what? The point is to do things differently. [and there's nothing inherently wrong with complexity]
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.