Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

[Discussion] M&M 3-5 style ranged combat

Chris Koźmik

Silver Lemur Games
Developer
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
416
People were asking me to introduce ranged combat in Legends of Amberland. They say it was done in M&M 3-5 so it's doable.
But, M&M 3-5 has a dark secret... monsters do not shoot at you if you do not see them (so the viable tactic is to turn around and move backwards approaching a ranged enemy, this allows you to ignore the enemy attacks). That's the trick that allowed them to implement such ranged combat system, without overburdening the UI (who shot at you at which direction, you ALWAYS see the enemy that targets you).

It was viable in the past, before the internet, but if I would try to do something like that nowadays, such exploit would be widely known and I would simply get bug reports about it...

Ideas how to approach this problem?
 

Grauken

Betting on SDG playing Veilguard if Trump loses
Patron
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Messages
13,008
People were asking me to introduce ranged combat in Legends of Amberland. They say it was done in M&M 3-5 so it's doable.
But, M&M 3-5 has a dark secret... monsters do not shoot at you if you do not see them (so the viable tactic is to turn around and move backwards approaching a ranged enemy, this allows you to ignore the enemy attacks). That's the trick that allowed them to implement such ranged combat system, without overburdening the UI (who shot at you at which direction, you ALWAYS see the enemy that targets you).

It was viable in the past, before the internet, but if I would try to do something like that nowadays, such exploit would be widely known and I would simply get bug reports about it...

Ideas how to approach this problem?
I never knew this but now that I know, damn it changes everything
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
you already have a way to display this in your current game

ss_c7024ba6cf318c0cecaeb3c3166f1bc7f332f9c6.1920x1080.jpg

the minimap, place a marker in the direction of where you last got hit if you can't see the target or something

perhaps consider an accessibility option to make being hit from behind/side more noticeable for deaf people beyond the UI damage splash over the character, I guess.
 

Darth Canoli

Arcane
Joined
Jun 8, 2018
Messages
5,737
Location
Perched on a tree
But, M&M 3-5 has a dark secret... monsters do not shoot at you if you do not see them (so the viable tactic is to turn around and move backwards approaching a ranged enemy, this allows you to ignore the enemy attacks). That's the trick that allowed them to implement such ranged combat system, without overburdening the UI (who shot at you at which direction, you ALWAYS see the enemy that targets you).

I never knew about this but I didn't use M&M 6+ switching combat modes exploit either.
If players want to cheat, they're only cheating themselves as it's a standalone game.

Just make the enemies visible on the map, blue for neutral, green for non-aggressive or the ones whom didn't spot your party, yellow for aggressive ones and red for the ones attacking, be it ranged or close combat.
Maybe add a range limit for spells and ranged weapons like 2/3 for spells and 3/4 for ranged weapons or just. 2 and 3.

In that case, the player always know which monsters attacked and you can't get attacked from too far away which would probably cause some problems.

Also, if you're not implementing caches like in early M&M or any other case sensitive things you can't spot if you don't walk on it, maybe you should increase the tiles clearing area from your current position to an aura of 1 or 2 tiles around the party.
It would help my autism making me walk every single tile to clear them all.
 
Last edited:

vlzvl

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
208
Location
Athens
Why do you care if the opponent sees you or not?

I have implemented ranged combat in The Darkness Below, although it's only allowed when the monsters are in neighbor squares i.e. the squares where the turn based battle is initiated, directly in front, back, left or right side.

If a character in my party gets a hit, I don't care from whom the hit came from, I know it came from some monster in the squares around the party, and I only use those blood graphics and an appropriate animation attack, unless they're attacks that take time i.e. a fireball coming for far away; In this case, if my party is not facing the some monster, I just show the blood graphics instantly and be done with it, otherwise the battle wont be quick but annoying.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom