Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Decline [GQ was right] I am a proud member of the Patch Hater Club

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,209
What about Project 4K77 or Harmy's Despecialized?
 

El Presidente

Arcane
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Messages
1,569
Location
Oval Office
It is true that old games, even old console games, had patches and we just weren't aware of it.

It is also true those patches were pretty much a joke compared to the hyper patch-friendly current state of things. For example, Donkey Kong Country have 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 cartridges. Here's the list of fixes:

USBB217.jpg

That's a bunch of nothing. Many such cases, with the occasional game breaking bug that you'd face in 1 out of 5000 runs getting fixed. Even buggy games were more polished than today's mildly stable releases.

Divide the industry's history in two halves, pre patch craze and post patch craze, and see which era gave you the better games. It's that simple.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom