Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Hammer and Sickle Review Proves Gamers are Wimps

Naked_Lunch

Erudite
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
5,360
Location
Norway, 1967
<strong>[ Game -> Review ]</strong>

<p><a href="http://www.gamedaily.com/">GameDAILY</a> has served up a new shit-tacular review of the
Strategy/RPG <a href="http://www.hammer-sickle.com/">Hammer and Sickle</a> (Which totally rocks), with a final score of <b>2.5/5</b>.


Here's the conclusion so you don't have to read this junk:</p><p><em>Ever hear the expression "You'll either love it or hate it; there is no middle ground."? This is one of those times. <em>Hammer &amp; Sickle</em> delivers some very deep, very complex strategy, but it comes as a huge cost. It's from the team behind <em>Silent Storm</em>,
and even uses their engine, but somehow everything but the graphics
regressed. The RPG elements present are barely there. Presentation is
poor, with bad music and poor dialogue with troubled accents, plus a
plot that could confuse David Lynch makes for a difficult game
experience at best. Only those who really loved <em>Silent Storm</em></em> <em>or those in a serious strategy craving need apply.</em></p><p>So,
it's deep and complex and generally fun but it sucks becuase it has bad
music and crappy voice-overs (I'm sure Oblivion will rate high with
these morons. I mean PATRICK STEWART, can't go wrong with him!). Get
your priorities straight, people!
</p><p> </p>

Read the rest of this crap <a href="http://pc.gamedaily.com/game/review/?gameid=4619">here.</a><p>Spotted @ <a href="http://www.bluesnews.com">Blues News</a></p>
 

Nicolai

DUMBFUCK
Joined
Mar 8, 2003
Messages
3,219
Location
Yonder
6 said:
Ever hear the expression "You'll either love it or hate it; there is no middle ground."? This is one of those times.

So.. Why did it get 2.5/5?
 

Naked_Lunch

Erudite
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
5,360
Location
Norway, 1967
Yeah, going but those terms it should've gotten 4.5-5 or 1-0. Just another reason why review scores are useless and asinine.
 

LlamaGod

Cipher
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
3,095
Location
Yes
You posted news!

You win a gold star!


Keep it up, soon you might get a cookie.
 

LlamaGod

Cipher
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
3,095
Location
Yes
I fixed up this news post and re-did your other one.

SHAPE UP OR SHAPE OUT

HUSTLE, SON
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom