deuxhero
Arcane
topic
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Love JA2, how is JA1?
- Thread starter deuxhero
- Start date
Psycroptic
Liturgist
I find some of the dialog even more amusing. I'd always put this one idiotic character in my group. He sounded like Barney from the kids show. The other mercenaries hated him, much to my amusement.
No gameplay outside combat (if you can call the non-combat stuff in JA2 gameplay; I can) and less options in combat. Combat depth is about the same as Fallout games, except you control a party, and that you can destroy walls etc. I last played it again two years ago, I think. Everything about the game still holds up pretty good to this day. Nothing like "amazing how people could take this clunky stuff back then", be it interface or combat mechanics. So you should play it.
The standalone add-on is uninteresting though. If you find yourself craving for more tactical challenges after you're done with JA, you should give it a try nonetheless.
The standalone add-on is uninteresting though. If you find yourself craving for more tactical challenges after you're done with JA, you should give it a try nonetheless.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.