Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

While my proposed dialog violates what a function is, it be a feature anyway.

Sankarihauta

Prospernaut
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
322
A Function has an output for every input, never different outputs for the same input.


Dialog choices which are vague give a single less vague response for each one. Where response is what your character seemingly says to the other entity.

Now men. There's a potential for a feature here. If you're going to make your choices vague, then higher quantities of less vague things could be triggered to be said per selection.

Unfortunately you get pretty much always the same dialog line(s).
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom