Ladders & Snakes
Educated
You know it.
Interactive movies. Teh suck.
Sceptic said:Gee I didn't know WC3/4 were 3rd person shooters with a cover system and health regen!
IV was a pretty solid space shooter with high-budget cut-scenes and some C&C. Definitely not a popamole.Ladders & Snakes said:
You know it.
Interactive movies. Teh suck.
WC3 did, pick one of twoClockwork Knight said:The dawn of rpg gaming also didn't have romances
C&C was there as far back as 1. Don't remember if 4 followed the same pattern, but 1,2 and 3 (as well as the 4 addons to 1 & 2) had a really cool branching structure, where winning or failing missions would set you on the "good ending" or the "not as good ending" branch (as well as an eventual "you lose" ending), and you could jump back and forth between the branches (as well as intermediate sub-branches) depending on which missions are successful and which are not. Really cool way to do things.Awor Szurkrarz said:IV was a pretty solid space shooter with high-budget cut-scenes and some C&C.
WC was always more of an action game with simulation trappings than a real space flight simulator. X-Wing and TIE Fighter were much closer to the simulation end.Ruprekt said:The combat wasn't up there with x wing and tie fighter.
Awor Szurkrarz said:Too bad EA killed Origin
Sceptic said:Gee I didn't know WC3/4 were 3rd person shooters with a cover system and health regen!
Oh wait they're not.
Shitty newfag should learn his memesThread sucks and OP is a faggot.
and that is an insult to Jaesun
Chateaubryan said:WC 3 was boring and repetitive. It was 94's Mass Effect 2. Out the same year, Star Crusader had far more C&Cs and richer gameplay than WC III, wich had just some gaudy full-motion-videos, a handful of C&C's and was hyped by the press just as today's popamole blockbusters are.