Look . . . I don't want to be too much of an asshole, because you seem like a nice guy. But you asked for criticism, and you are running a site open to the public, so what the hell?
First, I mostly agreed with much of the review, although I don't really agree that Baldur's Gate was a sandbox. (Then again, the only RPG that I really, really consider to be a sandbox is Darklands; but even games like Oblivion or Daggerfall are closer than Baldur's Gate.) At the very least, you should have stated your definition of sandbox, because it clearly differed from mine. (I would call Baldur's Gate non-linear rather than sandbox, meaning that it has a plot, but the plot doesn't have a set order. To me, "sandbox" means that you may have an overall goal, or you may set a goal for yourself, but one way or another gameplay is about trying to achieve that goal; there is not much of an external plot foisted upon you.) Still, like I said, I mostly thought the content of the review was good.
One minor quibble: it might have been worth mentioning the modding scene. I think that's one advantage indie reviewers dealing with older games have compared to mainstream publications putting out reviews at the time of game release. It would have been nice to tell readers that they can now play Baldur's Gate at higher resolution in the BGII engine using Tutu, or that modders have fully fleshed out all of the NPCs to be even more talkative than the ones in BGII, for example. I think that would be nice for someone who played BG back when it was released and is thinking about perhaps replaying it.
Now, to the part where I'm going to be really critical. Your grammar/writing is pretty poor, and I think that you should see about getting an editor or something. I'm obviously not going to go through everything, but let me just look at your first sentence:
Morbus's Review said:
Often acknowledged as one of the best Role-Playing Games ever (even if arguably worse than its sequel), Baldur’s Gate did broke some boundaries, but lacks some things other RPG’s have, released both earlier and later.
Did is present tense, broke is past tense; you want either "did break" or just "broke." My vote is for "did break," which has a more skeptical tone.
Role-Playing shouldn't be hyphenated, and Role Playing Games shouldn't be capitalized.
Your last clause, "released both earlier and later," is really awkward, primarily because it comes after the verb "have" rather than directly after the noun it is describing.
Also, "RPG's" is just wrong - the apostrophe indicates either a possessive noun or a contraction, and this is neither. You just want RPGs.
I would revise this sentence to read:
Despite being surpassed by its sequel in some ways, Baldur's Gate is widely regarded as one of the best role playing games ever made. However, although its release did break some boundaries, it lacks certain elements common to RPGs made both before and since.
Even this isn't quite grammatically correct, but it's an improvement, and I think it flows better.
