- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 97,606
Used to be a time he posted here, after all.
If you're talking about Pete, then that was kind of obviously a troll account
Used to be a time he posted here, after all.
No, I was talking about kathode, Pete Hines' former username he used on ESF and around the web.
New Vegas's bugginess was a factor in the lower scores. did review copies come with the bug fix patch that came out the day after the game was released? If not then it's possible that that patch alone could have raised the average review score by a single percentage point. If they'd had a little extra time to integrate those bug fixes into the game itself rather than needing to patch it they might well have seen that bonus. Add Roguey's claim that Bethesda pushed the game's release date forward and it looks like Obsidian didn't meet their contract requirements because of Bethesda's actions, ie Bethesda screwed over Obsidian.Don't see how Bethesda screwed over Obsidian. Are publishers under some obligation to provide bonuses for contract agreements that haven't been met?
Hence "Bethesda pushed the release date forward". Sure the teacher doesn't have to wait until Friday to collect your homework, but if you were doing your homework under the assumption that you had until Friday, it won't be ready if the teacher decides to collect it on Thursday.That's like blaming the teacher for collecting the homework before you're done with it. You were supposed to do it yesterday, the teacher doesn't have to wait until the last second of class. If that patch alone could raise the score to 85%, then Obsidian didn't meet the requirements because of their own actions, releasing a buggy game.
New Vegas had a day one patch. It fixed over 300 quest and scripting issues.
Reviewers do not "buy" games, they receive them in packages that also contain Mountain Dew and Doritos.Serves them right for buying such a game for a console.
How in the fuck did Bethesda screw Obsidian?
If two kids are playing with a hammer and one goes to the other "hey, hit your head really hard! It'll make you feel great" and the second kid smashes his head with the hammer and dies is it the first kids fault? No, because stupidity falls on the person who's stupid.
Obsidian was stupid for accepting the terms. Bitching about it later is moronic and they deserved whatever resulted from such a poor decision. Bethesda may be a douchebag but I don't blame them in this situation.
More like, the first kid says to the second kid, fist yourself with the hammer... or you starve. And every other kid the second kid goes to, has similar terms.
More like, the first kid says to the second kid, fist yourself with the hammer... or you starve. And every other kid the second kid goes to, has similar terms.
More like, the first kid says to the second kid, fist yourself with the hammer... or you starve. And every other kid the second kid goes to, has similar terms.
me too, both the posts.More like, the first kid says to the second kid, fist yourself with the hammer... or you starve. And every other kid the second kid goes to, has similar terms.
I made an edit.
Was KSer an option in that era?
DragoFireheart
Its like asking street hookers in third worldia...
thats what obsidian was reduced to bro, thier baby was sold and raped. For a chance to work with it, they had to whore themselves.DragoFireheart
Its like asking street hookers in third worldia...
Non-comparable.
thats what obsidian was reduced to bro, thier baby was sold and raped. For a chance to work with it, they ahd to whore themselves.
thats what obsidian was reduced to bro, thier baby was sold and raped. For a chance to work with it, they ahd to whore themselves.
And they weren't FORCED to work with it. They CHOOSE to.
You know, that thing called C&C? You'd think they would understand that well, but I guess that doesn't apply to the real world.