It did OK, nothing amazing.
you can feel the despair radiating through this post
It did OK, nothing amazing.
It did OK, nothing amazing.
It did OK, nothing amazing.
What build you is?Lol, the "barrow wights" (whatever they really were, I suspect just some drugged up yokels) and subsequent angry mob in Skerninge were very fun. The entire scenario was pretty cool in fact.
Gaem is much cool, shoulda got it earlier.
I just started playing and reached the British campaign. It's easily the best RPG to have come out in 2017.
I just started playing and reached the British campaign. It's easily the best RPG to have come out in 2017.
Is Expeditions: Viking a good game? Yes, yes it is. My criticisms are many, but they address the relatively lofty heights to which the game clearly aspires: a turn-based tactical RPG that somehow merges elements of an exploratory, resource-management strategic layer with a quest/story-driven model. The results are ambiguous, and in many ways, I prefer the tightly woven mechanics of Conquistador. But if you were to ask me whether it is worth the money, I would answer, absolutely: it is a game that provides robust turn-based tactical combat, a competently written historical setting, and plenty of entertaining quests. I dearly hope that the Expeditions series continues – and continues to tinker its formula.
I for one voted for Expeditions: Viking as GOTY 2017 in the codex poll while all the rest of you voted for Divinity Original Sin 2Can't remember a best rpg in the last decade, actually. It has everything the local whinos claim to want in spades(turn-based party combat, tons of C&C, good writing but not a storyfag game). Not sure what happened.
He could have just erased this last paragraph and written "meh, it was good for what it is" instead.