Grotesque
±¼ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 9,020
4Xes don't typically aim to be realistic simulations of space, or really, any simulation of space. Space is just the excuse setting in which you paint maps.I can't stand space games that have the understanding of astronomy (scale and looks) at the level of a 5 year old.
If a game actually tried to capture the terrible secret of space, it would probably fail to actually function as a 4X wargame as it would turn out there is nothing to fight over and nobody to fight with, and also, it's your great^N grandchildren that will be doing any of that fighting, if they still care to by the time they get there, and remember who it is and what it is they were supposed to fight over.
what are you talking about is completely missing my point
I was talking about scale and looks: how different astronomical bodies are depicted in relation to others (scale), how orbits actual look, how distances between bodies are depicted.
Nobody wants a very realistic depiction and of course a certain level of abstraction is needed but some games just shit on this concept.
That's why Nexus: The Jupiter Incident blew me away with its briefing animations depicting solar systems because it was clear that the one in charge of those was an enthusiast and knew what he/she/it was doing. That's the gold standard.
Last edited: