Wow, I just can't believe what I saw
"Hey, IGN gave it a 2.0 score, that's incline right there!"
Ahh, the feeling of being completely wrong in the morning, what a great mood.
Basically the girl that did the review goes beyond the definition of "retarded game journalism" and bashes the game
for all the wrong reasons. It would be funny if it was a parody or something (which is actually what this review seems to be, I hope)
See ir for yourself:
http://www.ign.com/videos/2010/11/17/ha ... ctid=61056
- You can do some side missions but that isn't great when you're trying to tell a cohesive story
- Cover shooting isn't a bad idea at all, but there isn't enough cover at the final levels
- There is a first person stealth sequence at some point, but it's just too difficult because of the limited perspective (yea, Thief sucks because of that, it's not a masterpiece as metal gear is, where you can look around with the camera while hiding inside a box)
- It's pretty hard to know where you're supposed to go, even with a spell that POINTS THE DIRECTION TO YOU
- The Kinect thing with the wand is actually the best part of the game
Consider myself impressed with the so called journalists, once again.