DarkUnderlord said:If you compare daily unique average, NMA is on 6,597 visitors per day. The Codex is easily above 10,000 visitors per day. Our current month visitors are 250k to NMA's 150k. Last month we had 420k to NMA's 200k. That's over double, baby!
So, come back when you have some real statistics?
Oh, come on. That's obviously because I started posting actively again.Brother None said:PPS: I'm also curious, why the spike in March, a period of great inactivity for the site?
We appear to be in the same ball park, going by the "wildly innacurrate" comparison methods we were using above. Though the 'Watch is certainly more useful as a news site (well, it's where I go to see what's current), I always got the impression our forums were more active, so maybe that evens things out.Brother None said:I also always wondered vs RPGWatch
Brother None said:Tell you what, one day I'll bug him again for Webalizer, and then I'll come back once again to mock you. Again.
Brother None said:PPPS: I also always wondered vs RPGWatch, considering that's a content-heavy site and this is a content-less site, I wonder what kind of traffic they get.
Dhruin said:I don't really go for this e-penis comparison but what did you want to know? In my opinion, all these websites (Alexa etc) are worthless - show me figures for monthly uniques tracked by the server.
HA, I'd be banned before I made my first post, and you know it. Not falling for that.Brother None said:You should post on NMA. It's a much better site.
There's a bit of a difference between "wildly incorrect" and "not being that accurate". Seriously, using Alexa (or any of those tracking sites for that matter) to prove anything doesn't work. It doesn't work for big sites and it doesn't work for small sites. Of course, you've only added the disclaimer recently since I pointed out to you how awful Alexa was. The first round of this we did, you were convinced Alexa was some kind of wonderfully accurate tracking system.Brother None said:Thanks for repeating everything I just said back to me. I already noted Alexa isn't that accurate.
Based on numbers you're pulling out of your ass?Brother None said:Though I should note there that compete seems to have it down pat; you were bigger last month, but otherwise you're at about 2/3-3/4 of NMA.
All you've got so far is some kind of "rough guess" that NMA has more hits to the forum and heaps of people must be visiting your gallery and completely missing the front page. Take a look at the posts in the forums on NMA and Codex and you find both forums are about the same in terms of activity, with slightly more activity on the Codex forums (Hint: the "new posts since last visit" feature works great).Brother None said:But that's just the thing, NMA's extreme-dm tracker doesn't even show a fraction of what we actually have. It doesn't count hits to files, the forum, the gallery, es.nma, to.nma, etc. etc., not to mention hits it misses because the program sucks. I'd be surprised if it represents more than 2/3rd of our hits. I've pointed this out to you before, several times, yet you insist on comparing your Webalizer stats to NMA's extreme-dm. You must be stupid, or something.
Like I said, come back when you have some real statistics, bitch.Brother None said:Yeah, I've asked Silencer for Webalizer before, he just ignores me. I guess he doesn't care as much about penis length as you and I do. Tell you what, one day I'll bug him again for Webalizer, and then I'll come back once again to mock you. Again.
DarkUnderlord said:The first round of this we did, you were convinced Alexa was some kind of wonderfully accurate tracking system.
DarkUnderlord said:Based on numbers you're pulling out of your ass?
DarkUnderlord said:All you've got so far is some kind of "rough guess" that NMA has more hits to the forum and heaps of people must be visiting your gallery and completely missing the front page. Take a look at the posts in the forums on NMA and Codex and you find both forums are about the same in terms of activity, with slightly more activity on the Codex forums (Hint: the "new posts since last visit" feature works great).
DarkUnderlord said:Like I said, come back when you have some real statistics, bitch.
Possibly because we see that the engorged penis duelling between you two is a little sad and unnecessary.Brother None said:you guys aren't helping. Where's the rally to DU's side. This thread should hit 10 pages, at least. I'm willing to troll until it does, even if it takes me all year
Shagnak said:Possibly because we see that the engorged penis duelling between you two is a little sad and unnecessary.
Why do you keep using it then? Webalizer stats, made from server logs, trump anything you could ever pull out of your ass or off the net. So when our webalizer stats keep saying we're higher than everything you've shown us, I'll keep trusting them (plus also because of the fact that they do actually track real visits to your site and not just retards who use a browser plugin or only traffic from certain countries).Brother None said:Eh? I've never thought that.DarkUnderlord said:The first round of this we did, you were convinced Alexa was some kind of wonderfully accurate tracking system.
Like I said, numbers you're pulling out of your ass. You didn't really think that when one completely useless tracking tool gets shot-down, switching to another one would be any different?Brother None said:Based on, as I said, Compete.DarkUnderlord said:Based on numbers you're pulling out of your ass?
It's called google. Learn how to use it.Brother None said:Though Compete is no doubt as inaccurate as Alexa, but for some reason you're ignoring all mention of it, hence my prodding.
You'd have noticed then that the Codex forums are regularly busier than NMA.Brother None said:Hint: that's the feature I use to read all forums.DarkUnderlord said:(Hint: the "new posts since last visit" feature works great).
Making more statistics up again I see. How would you know where that traffic is headed if you're not actually tracking it?Brother None said:You wouldn't even believe how much traffic SA sends our way that way, but only a fraction of it is to the frontpage.
So you want to include people who aren't actually reading the content on your site in your visitor numbers? Awesome. Just create a porn section and dump the x-treme tracker there. That should give you all the e-peen you need.Brother None said:But yes, heaps of people are visiting our galleries and files without going via the frontpage. Because lots of people, and sites, link directly to such pages. You wouldn't even believe how much traffic SA sends our way that way, but only a fraction of it is to the frontpage.
Oh please, this is the second time you've run this angle to get server stats so you can check your e-peen. I'm perfectly happy to oblige however. Especially when you still can't show any decent statistics.Brother None said:Sorry I hurt your feelings, dude.DarkUnderlord said:Like I said, come back when you have some real statistics, bitch.
DarkUnderlord said:Just create a porn section