Brancaleone
Prophet
nec plena turpi matris olla resina,how many statues, paintings, etc., of women have you seen that have body hair?
the idea of body hair removal being a modern thing is a fabrication
It is possible that ancient statues are a certain idealization. However in ancient times hair removal was an important hygienic and aesthetic ritual, at least for upper class women (and partial for men) in Greece, Rome, Egypt, middle East. In medieval times the aesthetic reason was less important (fewer occassions to present oneself naked) but hygienic one was even more important - to combat lice (for this reason prostitutes removed pubic hair).
The methods of course were considerably more painful (for both men and women) than today.
Summemmianae qua pilantur uxores
Mart. 12.32.21-2
(even the lowliest prostitutes were expected to be hairless)
Quod pectus, quod crura tibi, quod bracchia vellis,
Quod cincta est brevibus mentula tonsa pilis:
Hoc praestas, Labiene, tuae—quis nescit?—amicae.
Cui praestas, culum quod, Labiene, pilas?
Mart. 2.62
(full body depilation)
circa corporis curam morosior, ut non solum tonderetur diligenter ac raderetur, sed uelleretur etiam
Suet. Jul. 45.2
"[Julius Caesar was] somewhat overnice in the the care of his person, being not only carefully trimmed and shaved, but even having superfluous hair plucked out"
And so on...
Last edited: