Ellef
Deplorable
High IQ detected.Joined: Nov 1, 2017
Joined: Oct 19, 2017
samefags detected
High IQ detected.Joined: Nov 1, 2017
Joined: Oct 19, 2017
samefags detected
Reliability and validity
Psychometricians generally regard IQ tests as having high statistical reliability. A high reliability implies that – although test-takers may have varying scores when taking the same test on differing occasions, and although they may have varying scores when taking different IQ tests at the same age – the scores generally agree with one another and across time. Like all statistical quantities, any particular estimate of IQ has an associated standard error that measures uncertainty about the estimate. For modern tests, the standard error of measurement is about three points. Clinical psychologists generally regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.In a survey of 661 randomly sampled psychologists and educational researchers, published in 1988, Mark Snyderman and Stanley Rothman reported a general consensus supporting the validity of IQ testing. "On the whole, scholars with any expertise in the area of intelligence and intelligence testing (defined very broadly) share a common view of the most important components of intelligence, and are convinced that it can be measured with some degree of accuracy." Almost all respondents picked out abstract reasoning, ability to solve problems and ability to acquire knowledge as the most important elements.
IQ scores are used for educational placement, assessment of intellectual disability, and evaluating job applicants.
So you're saying that all this time you were referring to general testing of intelligence and not ''the'' IQ test that gives a single number as metric for intelligence? So every time you were referring to ''IQ'' you were actually referring to modern methods for testing intelligence quotient and not the original IQ test? Because when people talk about ''IQ test'' as a noun it almost always certainly means the old test; otherwise they'd say an IQ test in which case you'd be right. There are many tests considered reliable measures of intelligence but the IQ test isn't one of them.My God, these two brainlets jerking each other off. It seems they had someone read the article out loud for them, but he omitted or changed some words to fuck with them.
Let me make one last final simply worded attempt at clearing things up lest you embarrass yourselves if you ever go outside.
The link I provided said the original, historical, formula isn't used anymore. "Mental age" is nowadays used only when dealing with kids and not on IQ tests, which use a variety of formulas, most commonly the one mentioned in the article.
Now let's step back to another Wikipedia article and do some quoting:
Reliability and validity
Psychometricians generally regard IQ tests as having high statistical reliability. A high reliability implies that – although test-takers may have varying scores when taking the same test on differing occasions, and although they may have varying scores when taking different IQ tests at the same age – the scores generally agree with one another and across time. Like all statistical quantities, any particular estimate of IQ has an associated standard error that measures uncertainty about the estimate. For modern tests, the standard error of measurement is about three points. Clinical psychologists generally regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.In a survey of 661 randomly sampled psychologists and educational researchers, published in 1988, Mark Snyderman and Stanley Rothman reported a general consensus supporting the validity of IQ testing. "On the whole, scholars with any expertise in the area of intelligence and intelligence testing (defined very broadly) share a common view of the most important components of intelligence, and are convinced that it can be measured with some degree of accuracy." Almost all respondents picked out abstract reasoning, ability to solve problems and ability to acquire knowledge as the most important elements.
IQ scores are used for educational placement, assessment of intellectual disability, and evaluating job applicants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient
"Not used today"
"Unreliable"
What other buzzwords will you throw up?
Pls give these two idiots "brainlet" tags DarkUnderlord
Its called paraphrasing you mouth breather. Can you answer or not?So you're admitting you can't read and were arguing semantics all this time about something no one cares about or refers to when they talk about testing one's IQ?
Do you have autism on top of everything else?
Lately I've noticed a lot of low IQ posters on this website. I decided to compile a list of games which objectively require a high IQ in order to play. This way whenever people complain about any of these games being "stressful," "unfair," "tedious," "broken," etc. we can easily identify said person as a low IQ brainlet.
In no specific order:
11: Nier
10: STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl
9: Thief Gold (Bonus IQ point if you appreciate the superior pacing of Thief: The Dark Project without the missions added in Gold.)
8: Deus Ex
7: Demon's Souls, if you don't have a PS3 then Dark Souls will do
6: Siren
5: Fallout 1 (With the time limit.)
4: Pathologic
3: King's Field
2: Gothic
1: Quake (1 and 2, not 3.)
Feel free to propose some other high IQ game candidates.
Most of your shit isn't particularly brainy. Here's some, in no particular order:Feel free to propose some other high IQ game candidates.
These games no longer have a point as the computer is better at them than any human is. Therefore, you have already lost, so it is pointless to play: Winners never quit, quitters never win, but those who never win and never quit are idiots.2. Chess
1. Go
Thought of another high IQ series: Armored Core.
These games no longer have a point as the computer is better at them than any human is.
You're thinking of Steel Battalion (both by the same developers), but yes Steel Battalion for the original xbox with the full controller is definitely high IQ.Thought of another high IQ series: Armored Core.
Good luck trying to find a controller for that or even worse: make the kinect version fucking work.
Spacechem is p. fun even though most of it is effectively programming in befunge-like language.2. Anything Zachtronics.
It's okay, by then we will probably also BE computers. Games will no longer be necessary when all are now Borg.Sooner or later a computer will be better than a human at doing everything, so whats the point of anything by that logic?