Someone claimed that the Jews aren't a nation. The following is from "The International Jew" by Henry Ford:
- - -
Graetz, the historian of the Jews, whose monumental work is one of the standard authorities, says that the history of the Jews, even since they lost the Jewish State,
"still possesses a national character; it is by no means merely a creed or church history."
Moses Hess, one of the historic figures through whom the whole Jewish Program has flowed down from its ancient sources to its modern agents, wrote a book entitled "Rome and Jerusalem" in which he stated the whole matter with clearness and force:
"The Jews are something more than mere 'followers of a religion,' namely, they are a race, a brotherhood, a nation." (p. 71).
"A Jew belongs to his race and consequently also to Judaism, in spite of the fact that he or his ancestors have become apostates." (pp. 97-98).
"Every Jew is, whether he likes it or not, solidly united with the entire nation." (p. 163).
"Jewish religion is, above all, Jewish patriotism." (p. 61).
Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and world leader of the Zionist movement, wrote in his book "Zionism and the American Jews," -
"Despite the meditations of pundits or the decrees of councils, our own instinct and acts, and those of others, have defined for us the term 'Jew'."
Rabbi Morris Joseph, sometime of the West London Synagogue of British Jews, writes in his book "Israel a Nation," -
"Israel is assuredly a great nation . . . Israel is recognized as a nation by those who see it; no one could possibly mistake it for a sect. To deny Jewish nationality you must deny the existence of the Jew."
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references- ... jew-4.html
- - -
You should read the whole short chapter.
As for the Jewishness of Bolshevism, the following links to a chapter from the same book, which you should read as well:
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references- ... jew-9.html
Also, if bolshevism or communism isn't Jewish, then what is it? I mean, what is it for? (Is this question too deep for someone whose interest is limited to "history"?) Is communism for the workers, the unpriviliged, by various empathic individuals regardless of race? If it is, then why were the first decades of the USSR the most destructive ones for the peasants and workers of the USSR, those exact decades during which the Jews were dominant? (In contrast to popular claims, the Jews didn't do bad afterward either: "six of the seven oligarchs who emerged in control of the Soviet economy and media in the period of de-nationalization of the 1990s were Jews." That should be a matter of public record, but if you want a source because it's not "basic history", try Kevin MacDonald.)
Anyway, the question is, who, besides the Jew, benefits from such bolshevism both in theory and practice?
Someone accused me of uncritical reading of history. I'll accuse that someone of superficial reading of mostly fabricated history, fabricated by the Soviet Jews. Poland was an official part of the USSR for quite a while, wasn't it (until 1989)? What makes the reading superficial is the inability to see beyond numbers and dates. It's a reading for school girls. There is such a thing as disproportionate influence. The Jews wield it, because of their racial traits, such as aggressiveness (in the sense used by MacDonald), high verbal intelligence, and extraordinary group cohesion. MacDonald has documented that wealthy Jews, CEOs and such, regardless of whether they are religious or not, contribute large sums to various Jewish organizations and causes. In contrast, what ever (de-nationalized) White internationalists such as the Rockefellers there may be, they never seem to contribute to White causes, but to internationalist causes, which are distinctly Jewish ones, and often they have Jews such as the Rothschilds behind them.
In the long run, a cohesive and intelligent group will outperform and very possibly destroy a group that lacks cohesion, howsoever large, noble, intelligent and worth preserving that (latter) "group" may be. And it
is about racial group competition over limited resources and over other things, partly motivated by revenge, at least for the Jews, the "victims". If that statement isn't true of all Jews, it's true of their leaders, the people that get things done. And such leaders may emerge basically anywhere from the Jewish gene pool.