Post rating system

[Raxmus]

I think it is a good idea to implement some kind of post rating system whereby each post has an option to be "rated" by 2 icons next to the post (let's say, a thumbs up and a thumbs down). Then there should be a + or - rating next to the post indicating its total. This would discourage trolls and spammers as they would be humiliated and have their self esteem crushed by their consistently low post ratings, while the elite posters who provide the site with content, info, and high brow humour will be rated higher and feel good about themselves.

If you agree, type "/thumb +" or something similar. If you disagree, type "/thumb -" and then we will take a total at the end. If the score is high, DU will have no choice but to make this a permanent feature.

 

[Crooked Bee]

You rated this post '1'! Great job, go hog wild!

 

[Satan]

2/10

 

[DwarvenFood]

In other news, they caught Ghadaffi.

 

[Atheist]

the software i use allows this, the ratings i added are "like", "gay" "america" and "citation needed"

it's pretty stupid

 

[Serious_Business]

I appreciate your fine wit, my good man. However to go with the spirit of said wit, I must conclude with the following rebuke : you are a faggot

 

[Terpsichore]

RPG Codex the circlejerk.

 

[Zed]

2/5

 

[Phelot]

IF U REP ME ILL REP U BACK KK?

 

[King Crispy]

Anyone who only posts 43 times in a period of just over three years obviously lacks the wisdom, patience and commitment to be seriously considered a desirable member of the Codex.

So ban this fagg0rt, I say.

 

[Awor Szurkrarz]

0/5

 

[pipka]

How about "Fuck You" counter to each post?

faggot/10

 

[Zarniwoop]

Yes, let's turn it into YouCodex and link it with Failbook accounts.

 

[Satan]

Facebook integration would actually be pretty cool.

 

[Zinc]

No, it wouldn't.

 

[Satan]

It would. Believe me

 

[Occasionally Fatal]

I think it is a good idea to implement some kind of post rating system whereby each post has an option to be "rated" by being quoted with a reply (let's say, something like "Good post!" or "You're retarded!"). Then there would be series of replies following the post indicating its quality. This would discourage trolls and spammers as they would be humiliated and have their self esteem crushed by consistently having everyone harangue them, while the elite posters who provide the site with content, info, and high brow humor will be duly applauded and feel good about themselves.

If you agree, quote this post and reply with "Good post!" or something similar. If you disagree, type "You're retarded!" and then we will take the replies as an indicator of quality. If the indication is high, DU will have no choice but to make this a permanent feature.

 

[SCO]

They say sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.

I don't care though

 

[DarkUnderlord]

0/5

 

[anus_pounder]

I appreciate your fine wit, my good man. However to go with the spirit of said wit, I must conclude with the following rebuke : you are a faggot

 

[Hoodoo]

gb2 fb fgt

 

[Xor]

Next-gen popamole garbage.

 

[tarkin]

Yeah, we had a retard button. It was funny for a week but it was also abused from day one. I say do not go for it.

Also since when writing a response is not good enough?
See, like this: 0/10 would not read again lolz.

 

[Zinc]

People are actually taking obvious troll seriously.

 

[EG]

The Ignore button is the only rating system needed.