naossano
Cipher
Sure thing, next you'll tell me Planescape Torment has a better story than pedit5.
But Fo3 has better story than Planescape, because EMOTIONS.
Sure thing, next you'll tell me Planescape Torment has a better story than pedit5.
TNO doesn't even have a dadSure thing, next you'll tell me Planescape Torment has a better story than pedit5.
But Fo3 has better story than Planescape, because EMOTIONS.
It was just a joke; see, Temple of Apshai might be historically relevant, but it's relatively sub-par compared to newer RPGs like Wizardry.
RPGWatch is that wayYou simply can't compare a game like Wizardry to something like Dark Souls. We need an official institution (like PEGI) which rates games for their RPG content. Make an official distinction between 'action game with RPG elements' and 'real RPG's'.
Dark Souls is better
If Dragon's Dogma is the first console game let in, I'll fucking kill myself.
You are truly the harbinger of .
What makes every game before Darklands bad to you? Genuinely curious.I'm not saying I have a pre-prepared list to hand you, but we may as well just outsource our lists to RPGwatch at this rate.
What makes every game before Darklands bad to you? Genuinely curious.
I didn't say they were all bad, some can be enjoyable enough. This is supposed to be a list of the great crpgs of all time, though, not a collection of mediocre gaming experiences. Some of them are downright shit, such as PST (at 1st place no less), while stuff like Fallout is just OK.
But what about these games makes them so awful to you? What makes Darklands a better experience than PST, or Fallout 1/2, or BG2? I won't put the laundry list of reasons why I think they're good since they've been stated ed nauseam, but these games have earned their spot for a reason. It's not a popular opinion you have, and frankly one I haven't seen before. I wanna understand!I didn't say they were all bad, some can be enjoyable enough. This is supposed to be a list of the great crpgs of all time, though, not a collection of mediocre gaming experiences. Some of them are downright shit, such as PST (at 1st place no less), while stuff like Fallout is just OK.
Some of them are downright shit, such as PST (at 1st place no less), while stuff like Fallout is just OK.
But what about these games makes them so awful to you? What makes Darklands a better experience than PST, or Fallout 1/2, or BG2? I won't put the laundry list of reasons why I think they're good since they've been stated ed nauseam, but these games have earned their spot for a reason. It's not a popular opinion you have, and frankly one I haven't seen before. I wanna understand!