Best idea ever. Also make it Polish language only and ban all Ameritards from posting there. Massive incline right there.When do we get polish rpg subforum ?
There are a lot of people in favour of the new layout.So when are you people reverting this?
Of course there are definitions for 'classic' and of course they have nothing to do with date.Not classics (deal with it)
You're assuming that there's some definition of "classic" that isn't reflected by date. I say we can define what a "classic" is entirely by date, if we want to.
Just 3 more years, bitches. 3 more years until Oblivion is a classic.
R00FLES
Oblivion was made in the 90's?
There are a lot of people in favour of the new layout.So when are you people reverting this?
And also a large number who want a KingComrade forum.
I can't ignore their opinions lightly. That would be discrimination.
I'll look forward to this. Unfortunately I was only getting started gaming during the 90s so I don't have much to contribute in that department. And the only games from the 90s that I'll play now are the ones considered good.I'll enjoy spamming your bullshit classics subforum with utterly shit games and calling them classics then.
WHOIS information for rpgcodex.com:
Creation Date: 2002-02-23 09:09:32
The date should be either this one, for whoever is authorized to see it: http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?posts/3
I see the discription changed a little. And it is still retarded. So only the Goldbox Games, Ultima, ES and Fallout belongs there? Or those were just examples?
Umm, and guys, what does Wizardry 8 do in the Golden Era part? It doesn't fit the reqiurements written for the subforum.
More like wizardry 8 gets in because Jaesun arbitrarily wants to abduct more threads from GRPGD to make it seem like his new pet forum is popularI see the discription changed a little. And it is still retarded. So only the Goldbox Games, Ultima, ES and Fallout belongs there? Or those were just examples?
Umm, and guys, what does Wizardry 8 do in the Golden Era part? It doesn't fit the reqiurements written for the subforum.
Just examples.
I think Wizardry 8 gets in because it's a faithful sequel to an old-timey franchise (Ultima 9 would not get in)
groke was last seen: Viewing thread FF7 Enhanced Edition coming to Steam?, 1 minute ago
That's why the whole system is bad. And no, 1994 wouldn't be a good date. This way some of the Might and Magic games (the good ones obviously) would be left aside. And if you think they are not classics, than fuck you!Subdividing GRPGD is a dumb move, but at least set the division date at the year that CRPG's died (1994). It is no coincidence that this is also the year SSI and Ultima died and the year the FPS became ascendant. Putting RTwP Bioware games in the same category as Gold Box is insulting.
That's why the whole system is bad. And no, 1994 wouldn't be a good date. This way some of the Might and Magic games (the good ones obviously) would be left aside. And if you think they are not classics, than fuck you!Subdividing GRPGD is a dumb move, but at least set the division date at the year that CRPG's died (1994). It is no coincidence that this is also the year SSI and Ultima died and the year the FPS became ascendant. Putting RTwP Bioware games in the same category as Gold Box is insulting.
That's why the whole system is bad. And no, 1994 wouldn't be a good date. This way some of the Might and Magic games (the good ones obviously) would be left aside. And if you think they are not classics, than fuck you!
Sorry but that's just stupid. M&M6-7 are great RPGs which are loved by the Codex. They are first person, just like the originals, have TB mode like the originals. Ok, they have real time mode, but IMO they remained loyal to the originals. Wizardry 8 also made some changes to the originals, yet it is there.That's why the whole system is bad. And no, 1994 wouldn't be a good date. This way some of the Might and Magic games (the good ones obviously) would be left aside. And if you think they are not classics, than fuck you!Subdividing GRPGD is a dumb move, but at least set the division date at the year that CRPG's died (1994). It is no coincidence that this is also the year SSI and Ultima died and the year the FPS became ascendant. Putting RTwP Bioware games in the same category as Gold Box is insulting.
Again, if the late M&M games are sequels that remained loyal to the design of the original games, they would be included.
Sorry but that's just stupid. M&M6-7 are great RPGs which are loved by the Codex. They are first person, just like the originals, have TB mode like the originals. Ok, they have real time mode, but IMO they remained loyal to the originals. Wizardry 8 also made some changes to the originals, yet it is there.That's why the whole system is bad. And no, 1994 wouldn't be a good date. This way some of the Might and Magic games (the good ones obviously) would be left aside. And if you think they are not classics, than fuck you!Subdividing GRPGD is a dumb move, but at least set the division date at the year that CRPG's died (1994). It is no coincidence that this is also the year SSI and Ultima died and the year the FPS became ascendant. Putting RTwP Bioware games in the same category as Gold Box is insulting.
Again, if the late M&M games are sequels that remained loyal to the design of the original games, they would be included.
/butthurt