Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Why was ††† banned?

Sunri

Liturgist
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
2,795
Location
Poland
Who was this guy anyway?
UpFBWh8.png
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,360
No-ban policy at its finest again...
I don't know where this stupidity comes from but the Codex has never had a no-ban policy. You literally can't run any kind of online space without banning problematic users from time to time.
 

Zarniwoop

TESTOSTERONIC As Fuck™
Patron
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
18,744
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
I wonder if people create drama just to have someone banned or is someone banned just to create some drama.

Tranny degenerates create drama because they're supposedly "harassed" but can't use a simple fucking ignore button and the troon-simps ban everyone else instead.
 

Unkillable Cat

LEST WE FORGET
Patron
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
27,268
Codex 2014 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy
No-ban policy at its finest again...
I don't know where this stupidity comes from but the Codex has never had a no-ban policy. You literally can't run any kind of online space without banning problematic users from time to time.
There's a reason I've held on to this quote for ~20 years now:

People on internet forums always seem to be labouring under the misconception that there are rules for them to find loopholes in. There aren't. If you annoy the people who run the forum, they deal with you, and your cries of "noooo, oppression!" are like music to their ears. Funky music, on a porn soundtrack, with women panting "yes, yes!" in the background
 

Immortal

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
5,062
Location
Safe Space - Don't Bulli
Konjad, if you don't believe I'm serious, look up Sheriff_Fatman. Find out who banned him and why.

For those that were curious like me.
(Did Konjad even post in this thread though? who was DU talking to...? )

This place has rarely been less moderated than it is now.
Maybe so, but I vividly remember DU mentioning you are banning more people than before.

It's a common myth that we never used to ban anyone. If you want the classic example, look for Sheriff_Fatman. He was one of the earliest posters banned by Saint_Proverbius because he was posting one thing on Duck and Cover, and the exact opposite on the Codex. In short, he was trolling. That's all he was here for. He wasn't actually giving his genuine opinion, he existed just to stir shit up.

The Codex, despite the trolling and baiting that occurs, exists for discussion. If we get a hint that you're not here to actually discuss anything and instead can only post things consisting of (for example) "LIBRULS ARE SHIT", to the point that's all your posts consist of. Then you go one further and whinge to me about why your shit was Retardo'd (like you're too stupid to figure it out), chances are you'll get Watch-witzed. Keep it up still, and you're likely to get queued. Keep that up, and you're likely to get banned.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom