Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies

Malamert
Malamert
Embrace this! *unlocks dick*
Cunt Dickula!?
Someone consumed too much ELEX.
HeroMarine
HeroMarine
aeternalis here's a candidate for devouring Descartes
aeternalis
aeternalis
I do not see logical thinking and emotion as incompatible. Rather the opposite.

However, if they are incompatible, I choose emotion and irrationality.
Wirdschowerdn
Wirdschowerdn
Balance you must have, Padawan.
The Brazilian Slaughter
The Brazilian Slaughter
aeternalis In my experience, I do see them as incompatible. I can only think logically if my mind is cleared of emotion. Emotions have their use, but when I get my big boy pants on and start doing real work and thinking, they have to go.

Why would you prefer emotion and irrationality to the beauty and perfection of rationality?

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom