Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

combatfags

  1. DJOGamer PT

    Incline Game Design Talk - Action Combat

    A thread dedicated to the discussion of the Design of Combat Mechanics and associated Systems in Action games - their working, their objective, the variety of their forms and ultimately their quality. This thread is not about any particular one style of Action Combat - be it within...
  2. Tyranicon

    Would you play 9/10 combat game with 1/10 unskippable story?

    So the newest marketing push from Dragon Age: Veilguard seems to be prioritizing their new, flashy action combat and we're getting headlines like: Which besides sounding really bad, is also disrespectful to the devs that worked on previous games but whatever. So a thought popped in my head...
  3. Bruma Hobo

    Decline The REAL False Dichotomy of Storyfag and Combatfag RPGs

    Storyfags are obviously retarded, everything they say is always wrong so you might think that they can be easily ignored, but that's not possible because of their brown Midas touch, just look how they massacred the Choices and Consequences concept by turning it into lame story branches, dialogue...

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom