Kamaz
Pahris Entertainment
Man, Fallouts should be the first in the top-ten cRPG's. If it is not, tell me, what other game had so wide game-world [and alive the meantime], style [you may not like it, but you oughta feel the taste of 50's there definetly], story, non-linearity, rust, reactive enviroment, nice RPG system [have not seen better yet in any cRPG before and after], world economics and so on. Isnt that obvious?
But Arcanum, meanwhile it was good, was not superb. The character creation system - I dont see anything why consider it good. I hated it as much as I liked SPECIAL. The limit of 50 levels also was not very pleasant and at the end I felt like too powerful to enjoy the game. And the boss was kinda lame, it was not too interesting to fight with him, oh well, itwas not interesting to fight with anyone down there. But the premise and world was ok, that for sure.
What is Darklands, heard them mentioned again and again as an example of good cRPG, but havent played or seen at leasta screen.
But Arcanum, meanwhile it was good, was not superb. The character creation system - I dont see anything why consider it good. I hated it as much as I liked SPECIAL. The limit of 50 levels also was not very pleasant and at the end I felt like too powerful to enjoy the game. And the boss was kinda lame, it was not too interesting to fight with him, oh well, itwas not interesting to fight with anyone down there. But the premise and world was ok, that for sure.
What is Darklands, heard them mentioned again and again as an example of good cRPG, but havent played or seen at leasta screen.