Vault Dweller
Commissar, Red Star Studio
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Messages
- 28,044
Tags: Bethesda Softworks; Fallout 3
<a href=http://www.1up.com>1UP</a> has posted <a href=http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3160085>an article</a> dedicated to the FO3 trailer and featuring the reaction of Games for Windows' (formerly known as Computer Gaming World magazine) staff:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Sean Molloy</b>: Smart start -- it certainly gave me faith that they're sticking with the original games' tone. You get olde radiola tunes, a quick glimpse at Pip (the original Fallout boy!) in those propaganda posters on the bus. <b>So yup, this is Fallout.</b> I'm also now completely convinced <b>it's gonna be some first-person Oblivion-style thing</b>. ...</blockquote>Fallout = some FP Oblivion thing? Makes sense.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>When the camera pulls out of the bus, and you see that ruined cityscape--I want to explore that s*** in first-person. Imagine that moment in Oblivion where you leave the first dungeon, only you see apocalypse instead of green acres. I don't think Bethesda could pass up that opportunity.</blockquote>My sentiments exactly.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Shawn Elliott</b>: Good God, this looks good. </blockquote>It's a fucking intro trailer, Shawn. You might want to save this excitement for a review. We already know how it would start.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>Voice what you will about Bethesda not having the knack for ink-black humor it needs to hammer out a true-to-the-series sequel, but think it through first. In my mind, Oblivion more than proved the developer's ability there...</blockquote>Yep, it was a real eye opener, Shawn.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>In fact, if Bethesda decides to take a radically different direction with Fallout 3, I'd rather that than a dull remake.</blockquote>How very black-n-white.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Jeff Green</b>: Yeah, this looks hot. I'm palpitating here. Okay, so it's just the trailer, and that has no bearings on whether they'll actually make a good game or not. But they nailed the tone here, dead on. Even the choice of that Ink Spots song ("set the world on fire"--get it??) was right on, especially considering that they could have gone with, um, Fall Out Boy, just to pick the worst possible alternative. </blockquote>You know things are going great when the best argument is "it could have been soooo much worse".
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>And put me on the list with you two wanting a radically different direction--like first-person perspective. </blockquote>
<br>
Is radically the new epic?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>I loved the first two Fallouts to death, but <b>now is not the time for another isometric turn-based RPG.</b></blockquote>I'd really love to hear the explanation for this bullshit. Anyone feel like emailing Jeff?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Not with the amazing possibilities that Bethesda could bring to this series after knocking it out of the park with Oblivion. I can't wait.</b></blockquote>*sigh*
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Darren Gladstone</b>: Let me slap on the devil's advocate hat for one second since nobody else here will. It's the blessing and the curse of being a gaming curmudgeon. I'm not gonna lie, Shawn. Prior to seeing the trailer, I was a little concerned about one thing: Bethesda being able to hit the depths of black humor Interplay previously did.</blockquote>Right. 'Cause everything else was tip-top. Oblivion was a perfect RPG in every way, but the depth of its humor was a bit disappointing. Such a shame, really.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>...Minor bitching and general dickery aside, let me say this: Wow. Inside of two minutes, Bethesda confirmed what I pretty much knew all along-that the Fallout franchise is in very capable hands.</blockquote>Is it some kinda best blowjob competition event? It would help if we know what the rules are.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>I'm right there with Sean Molloy. I need to see what happens the second I walk out of my vault and into Fallout 3's apocalypse. <b>I can deal with no more turn-based gameplay</b>...</blockquote>I too hope that someone will finally make a real-time game. I don't think I can handle yet another turn-based RPG.
<br>
<br>
<a href=http://www.1up.com>1UP</a> has posted <a href=http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3160085>an article</a> dedicated to the FO3 trailer and featuring the reaction of Games for Windows' (formerly known as Computer Gaming World magazine) staff:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Sean Molloy</b>: Smart start -- it certainly gave me faith that they're sticking with the original games' tone. You get olde radiola tunes, a quick glimpse at Pip (the original Fallout boy!) in those propaganda posters on the bus. <b>So yup, this is Fallout.</b> I'm also now completely convinced <b>it's gonna be some first-person Oblivion-style thing</b>. ...</blockquote>Fallout = some FP Oblivion thing? Makes sense.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>When the camera pulls out of the bus, and you see that ruined cityscape--I want to explore that s*** in first-person. Imagine that moment in Oblivion where you leave the first dungeon, only you see apocalypse instead of green acres. I don't think Bethesda could pass up that opportunity.</blockquote>My sentiments exactly.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Shawn Elliott</b>: Good God, this looks good. </blockquote>It's a fucking intro trailer, Shawn. You might want to save this excitement for a review. We already know how it would start.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>Voice what you will about Bethesda not having the knack for ink-black humor it needs to hammer out a true-to-the-series sequel, but think it through first. In my mind, Oblivion more than proved the developer's ability there...</blockquote>Yep, it was a real eye opener, Shawn.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>In fact, if Bethesda decides to take a radically different direction with Fallout 3, I'd rather that than a dull remake.</blockquote>How very black-n-white.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Jeff Green</b>: Yeah, this looks hot. I'm palpitating here. Okay, so it's just the trailer, and that has no bearings on whether they'll actually make a good game or not. But they nailed the tone here, dead on. Even the choice of that Ink Spots song ("set the world on fire"--get it??) was right on, especially considering that they could have gone with, um, Fall Out Boy, just to pick the worst possible alternative. </blockquote>You know things are going great when the best argument is "it could have been soooo much worse".
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>And put me on the list with you two wanting a radically different direction--like first-person perspective. </blockquote>
<br>
Is radically the new epic?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>I loved the first two Fallouts to death, but <b>now is not the time for another isometric turn-based RPG.</b></blockquote>I'd really love to hear the explanation for this bullshit. Anyone feel like emailing Jeff?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Not with the amazing possibilities that Bethesda could bring to this series after knocking it out of the park with Oblivion. I can't wait.</b></blockquote>*sigh*
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Darren Gladstone</b>: Let me slap on the devil's advocate hat for one second since nobody else here will. It's the blessing and the curse of being a gaming curmudgeon. I'm not gonna lie, Shawn. Prior to seeing the trailer, I was a little concerned about one thing: Bethesda being able to hit the depths of black humor Interplay previously did.</blockquote>Right. 'Cause everything else was tip-top. Oblivion was a perfect RPG in every way, but the depth of its humor was a bit disappointing. Such a shame, really.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>...Minor bitching and general dickery aside, let me say this: Wow. Inside of two minutes, Bethesda confirmed what I pretty much knew all along-that the Fallout franchise is in very capable hands.</blockquote>Is it some kinda best blowjob competition event? It would help if we know what the rules are.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>I'm right there with Sean Molloy. I need to see what happens the second I walk out of my vault and into Fallout 3's apocalypse. <b>I can deal with no more turn-based gameplay</b>...</blockquote>I too hope that someone will finally make a real-time game. I don't think I can handle yet another turn-based RPG.
<br>
<br>