Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Blade and Sword chipped by Boomtown

Saint_Proverbius

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
14,133
Location
Behind you.
Tags: Blade and Sword

<A href="http://pc.boomtown.net/">Boomtown</a> has posted <A href="http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=4457">a review</A> of <A href="http://www.whiptailinteractive.com/games_bladeandsword.php">Blade and Sword</a> giving it a really low <b>4/10</b> rating. Here's some of the pain:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>All this means that, even if you're an RPG newbie, it doesn't take long to find your way about the interface and get to grips with your character, whichever one that may be. Again, your choices are rather too similar to those in Diablo - a trio to choose from, two chaps and one lady, comprising the wimpy-but-fast, the tough-but-slow and the middleman. It's hardly inspired and, rather frustratingly, you have less control over your character's development than you might like. Each level advancement gifts you points which can only be spent on special attacks, the rest of your attributes being increased automatically, totally independent of your control. </blockquote>
<br>
<br>
My personal choice is <i>tough-but-slow</i>. Bring on the tank! Who's with me?
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <b>Role-Player</b>!
<br>
 

Otaku_Hanzo

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,463
Location
The state of insanity.
Saint_Proverbius said:
My personal choice is <i>tough-but-slow</i>. Bring on the tank! Who's with me?
Click to expand...

I'm all for a good tank character now and then, but I've always been a rooter for the underdog and like to play those types of characters. The ones who have it tough, but keep at it and pull through in the end. Funny thing about that though is the fact that in D2, I had my sorceress so tanked up that I was right up in the front with my friend's barbarian hacking and slashing away at the hordes. With the right skill choices, the sorceress makes a damn good tank, believe it or not. :)
 

Sol Invictus

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
9,614
Location
Pax Romana
The middle man is terribly bad because his attack combos can't queue up as much as the wimpy-but-fast character's. As a result, he gets hit more and dies a lot when his attack queues break because he can't kick to continue the attack combo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom