Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Fallout: New Vegas previewed

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,603
Location
Deutschland
Tags: Fallout: New Vegas; Obsidian Entertainment

Over yonder at NMA they <a href="http://nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=53793">have scans from the OXM UK preview</a> of FO: New Vegas.
<br>
<br>
OXM does, however, express their concern that New Vegas isn't developed by the original devs (Bethesda).
<br>
<br>
<p style="margin-left:50px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-top-color:#ffffff;padding:5px;border-right-color:#bbbbbb;border-left-color:#ffffff;border-bottom-color:#bbbbbb;">Clearly, you have a responsibility to push the series forward, but there's also nothing worse than a misguided attempt to differentiate a folow-up that only ruins what everyone loved about the original. Throw in a new developer - New Vegas is being developed by Obsidian rather than Bethesda's in-house team - and there is no doubt that a fair few Fallout fans will be more than a little concerned that this could be a recipe for nuclear disaster.
<br>
</p>
<br>
<br>
I can imagine all the diehard FO fans are weeping right now.
<br>
<br>
thanks Ausir!
<br>
<br>
Spotted at: <A HREF="http://nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=53793">NMA</A>
 

Multi-headed Cow

Guest
Beat you by half an hour. I claim this newspost in the name of Multiheaded Cowtonia.
 

Jim Cojones

Prophet
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
2,103
Location
Przenajswietsza Rzeczpospolita
OXM said:
Fallout 3 is, quite literally, a tale of following in your father’s footsteps, but you choose how closely or how distantly you toe that line in everything from a slew of tough moral conundrums to the exact route you take. You can be the saintly savior of all you encounter, a vile murderer of all you see, or more probably, you’ll find a comfortable gray area somewhere in between.
OXM said:
One of the things Fallout 3 was criticised for was its predetermined black-and-white moral choices - the developers decided which actions were right and which were wrong.
 

Shannow

Waster of Time
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,386
Location
Finnegan's Wake
Wow, that quote really coudn't be any more ironic.
Makes me want to rip off his head and puke into it. Since it is obviously empty it might just have enough room for all my vomit.


And they claim Fallout-fans are rabid and vitriolic. Pah.
 

Hoaxmetal

Arcane
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
9,173
Jim Cojones said:
OXM said:
Fallout 3 is, quite literally, a tale of following in your father’s footsteps, but you choose how closely or how distantly you toe that line in everything from a slew of tough moral conundrums to the exact route you take. You can be the saintly savior of all you encounter, a vile murderer of all you see, or more probably, you’ll find a comfortable gray area somewhere in between.
OXM said:
One of the things Fallout 3 was criticised for was its predetermined black-and-white moral choices - the developers decided which actions were right and which were wrong.
Pretty much sums up professional journalism as whole.
 

Monolith

Prophet
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Messages
1,298
Location
München
"Fallout 3 was both developed and published by Bethesda. New Vegas is being made by Obsidian. Why the change? [...] Obsidian was founded by former members of Black Isle Studios, which developed the original Fallout games on PC - there won't be any explicit connection to those, though."
Phew! I was getting worried there for a second.
 

Kingston

Arcane
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,392
Location
I lack the wit to put something hilarious here
Jim Cojones said:
OXM said:
Fallout 3 is, quite literally, a tale of following in your father’s footsteps, but you choose how closely or how distantly you toe that line in everything from a slew of tough moral conundrums to the exact route you take. You can be the saintly savior of all you encounter, a vile murderer of all you see, or more probably, you’ll find a comfortable gray area somewhere in between.
OXM said:
One of the things Fallout 3 was criticised for was its predetermined black-and-white moral choices - the developers decided which actions were right and which were wrong.

The Rybicki Maneuver in action. He could've just called it flip-flopping, though.
 

jagged-jimmy

Prophet
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
1,562
Location
Freeside
Codex 2012
VentilatorOfDoom said:
Clearly, you have a responsibility to push the series forward, but there's also nothing worse than a misguided attempt to differentiate a folow-up that only ruins what everyone loved about the original. Throw in a new developer - New Vegas is being developed by Obsidian rather than Bethesda's in-house team - and there is no doubt that a fair few Fallout fans will be more than a little concerned that this could be a recipe for nuclear disaster.

Thats an epic irony right there. Can't believe how stupid people can get. Well, not people, just gaming journalists.
 

SuicideBunny

(ノ ゜Д゜)ノ ︵ ┻━┻
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
8,943
Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Torment: Tides of Numenera
next gen reviewerator said:
there won't be any explicit connection to those, though.
nightkin, ncr, and bos do not count as explicit enough connections to fo1 and 2?
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,733
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
I think he means "It won't look like this"

screenshot_walking.jpg


Game journalists wouldn't really care about characters, organizations and such.
 

Chaud

Novice
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
49
Location
N/A
Jim Cojones said:
OXM said:
Fallout 3 is, quite literally, a tale of following in your father’s footsteps, but you choose how closely or how distantly you toe that line in everything from a slew of tough moral conundrums to the exact route you take. You can be the saintly savior of all you encounter, a vile murderer of all you see, or more probably, you’ll find a comfortable gray area somewhere in between.
OXM said:
One of the things Fallout 3 was criticised for was its predetermined black-and-white moral choices - the developers decided which actions were right and which were wrong.

Who knew this would happen? :lol:
 

Elzair

Cipher
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Messages
2,254
Odd, this story seems to read exactly like a thread posted by Pipboy4000 some months ago. I wonder if ol' PipBoy is a game journalist?
 

deuxhero

Arcane
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
11,970
Location
Flowery Land
Clockwork Knight said:
I think he means "It won't look like this"
snip[/img]

Game journalists wouldn't really care about characters, organizations and such.

There's a high res patch for Fallout (2?). How did I not get told about this?
 

Xor

Arcane
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,345
Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2
but there's also nothing worse than a misguided attempt to differentiate a folow-up that only ruins what everyone loved about the original

This is so ironic it hurts.
 

TwinkieGorilla

does a good job.
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
5,480
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pathfinder: Wrath
the irony hurts indeed...though not as much as the grim reality of Fallout 3 actually ruining what everyone loved about the original.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
8,268
Location
Gritville
but there's also nothing worse than a misguided attempt to differentiate a follow-up that only ruins what everyone loved about the original

The thing they loved? Furry nude mods and other shit. That's all Bethsda's games are good for.
 

denizsi

Arcane
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
9,927
Location
bosphorus
Life is good. If game journalists and gamers and developers and publishers all weren't being so retarded all the time, things would have been very dull.
 

MisterStone

Arcane
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
9,422
Can we at least be sober enough for a moment to admit that this is probably the best thing imaginable given the dissolution of Black Isle and the existence of FO 3: a sequel produced by former Black Isle people? This is as close to what you wankers want is you will ever get, try to be a little more optimistic.
 

Andyman Messiah

Mr. Ed-ucated
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
9,933
Location
Narnia
MisterStone said:
Can we at least be sober enough for a moment to admit that this is probably the best thing imaginable given the dissolution of Black Isle and the existence of FO 3: a sequel produced by former Black Isle people? This is as close to what you wankers want is you will ever get, try to be a little more optimistic.
Please shut the fuck up.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom