Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Dungeon Siege 2 checked out by Gamers with Jobs

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
14,043
Location
Behind you.
Tags: Dungeon Siege 2

<A href="http://www.gamerswithjobs.com/">Gamers with Jobs</a> has a <A href="http://www.gamerswithjobs.com/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=1168">little commentary preview</A> of <A href="http://www.gaspowered.com/ds2/">Dungeon Siege 2</a>. It's basically a back and forth dialogue between <b>Certis</b> and <b>Elysium</b> talking about the original and the upcoming sequel. Here's a bit from <b>Elysium</b>, because I can't trust <b>Certis</b> on the subject after his hype of the original:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><b>Elysium: </b>When I think back on Dungeon Siege, I usually remember liking it. Then I sit for a moment, and realize that, no, I didn’t actually like it. In fact, I stopped playing it after a dozen hours or so, finally bored with the whole exhausting endeavor. You see, I get confused because Dungeon Siege wasn’t exactly a bad game, nor was it a good game. It was, simply, an adequate game, not exactly a Diablo rip-off, and probably worse the wear for not just being a clone. For those who don't recall, Dungeon Siege's primary claim to fame was a contiguous world with no load times. For me, however, its claim to infamy was uninteresting story, cumbersome controls, poor AI, inventory management so overloaded that you actually had to have a pack mule, and a game that at times seemed to be playing itself.</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Hold on, <b>E</b>! I'm pretty sure <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/games/dungeonsiege/">Dungeon Siege</A> didn't <i>have</i> controls, let alone cumbersome ones!
<br>
<br>
Then again, the main reason you needed a pack mule is because it was nearly impossible to find an item you could use. Either it was for another type of character than you were playing, or it was out of your skill range.
<br>
<br>
Oh, and about the sequel, he continues with:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>Fortunately my first impression of Dungeon Siege II is that they've gotten rid of much that I didn't like about the first, and kept a lot of the touches that left me mistakenly under the impression that I actually liked the first one.</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
So, yay? We'll see.
<br>
 

Sol Invictus

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
9,614
Location
Pax Romana
We'll see. The skill trees sound infinitely more interesting than the classless system they went with the first.
 

Slaytanic

Educated
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
89
I can imagine myself 89 years old with grandchildren around me:
"The only thing even more boring than Dungeon Siege 1, was Dungeon Siege 2 ! SO take heed children."
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom