Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Sacred Underworld okay per Strategy Informer

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
14,152
Location
Behind you.
Tags: Sacred Underworld

There's <A href="http://www.strategyinformer.com/pc/sacredunderworld/review.html">a review</A> of <a href="http://www.sacred-game.com">Sacred: Underworld</a> over at <A href="http://www.strategyinformer.com/">Strategy Informer</A> where the game expansion scores a <b>7.3/10</b>.
<br>
<blockquote>Not much more can be said really, so that pretty much summes it up. With this expansion, Sacred has become a game well worth playing; correcting numerous bugs, adding much needed order into chaos and giving a general work-around to the game. The two new characters and a new land mass which amounts to about half of the original game are a highly welcomed bonus as well. Can't wait for the sequel!</blockquote>
<br>
Well, not much was said, but I'm guessing he liked it by the conclusion there.
<br>
<br>
Spotted at: <A HREF="http://www.bluesnews.com">Blue's News</A>
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom