Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

A discussion about adventure games

Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
1,261
The first computer games I ever played were Sierra On-Line adventure games, notably King's Quest and Space Quest. I got a bit older and in my teens for a time was big into RPGs like Baldur's Gate, and Diablo, and then action-adventure games like Kingdom Hearts.

As an adult I began earlier this year to revisit CRPG's, and I played Oblivion, Morrowind and Skyrim for the first time, and then also began playing Baldur's Gate I and II again for the first time in over a decade; I plan to soon start Fallout for the first time, and also lately have been getting into classic shooters like Quake.

And after this, I find going back to adventure games hard.

I came across a blog on CRPGs, and the blog writer stated this:

Fallout was an adventure game, but it came complete with stats, reactivity and combat system as well: a pure cRPG.
And cRPGs are inherently superior to adventure games. There is nothing adventure games do better than cRPGs.
Adventure games only exist post-Fallout because of ignorance, inertia and the casual demographic that loves on-rails narrative and cinematization.
Fallout was like the best adventure game you had ever played, multiplied by 100.

Anyone can program adventure games; as a rule, their code-bases and mechanics are basic. But hardly anyone can make cRPGs like Fallout.

And three decades of history attests to that being fact. There is only one Fallout game. Two if we admit Fallout 2. Three if we admit Arcanum. But there are thousands of copy-pasta adventure games influenced by the soulless slop scribbled by Sierra in 1984.


I do not agree with her in totality, of course, but I do wonder:

1) What do adventure games offer that other genres like the classic Western CRPG cannot?

2) Why did adventure games remain popular for a few years even alongside the original Diablo (1996) and Baldur's Gate (1998)?

3) Can there be anything more done to the adventure genre to modernize it without ruining it?

For example, as a start, making an adventure game fundamentally replayable? Adding an element of a party to an adventure game? Adding skills and leveling without adding combat? Multiple solutions to every puzzle?
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,768
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
That's a tryhard opinion piece by Lilura (self-ejected from Codex a while ago)... None of her statements you quoted above make a whole lot of sense to me. What she wrote is a bit like trying to "prove" that a sandwich is better than an ice cream, or something...

For one, almost all cRPGs are combat heavy. For people who really don't like violence in their games, that's a no starter. Then some people are really just into the narrative, the puzzle solving, and marveling at the graphics, and don't care about any sort of combat and stats-based gameplay.

Comparing adventure games to Fallout is just plain silly. Even an average adventure game has far more complex puzzles than the most complex puzzle-heavy cRPG.

I'd say classic adventures and cRPGs tend to have two quite distinct audiences. I like both, so clearly people who enjoy both genres exist, but I'd wager you'll find more people who like either, but not both.

That answers your first two questions. For question three, I don't think you can change them fundamentally without breaking the whole concept of an adventure game.

About replayability, I don't get much enjoyment from replaying RPGs either, especially long ones. There are exceptions, like Age of Decadence, where you must replay the game multiple times to unlock all possible paths, but in 95% of cRPGs all you get is the battles playing out a bit differently as I see it. In most RPGs it's still the same same map, the same story, the same sidequests, etc., so I'd say 80% of the game is fundamentally unchanged; all you get is slightly different mechanics for achieving the end goals. Plus most C&C stuff doesn't *really* matter in RPGs, so there's that too.

I'm just mentioning this because the non-linearity and replayability angle of RPGs is often vastly exaggerated. Sure, there are special people who like doing the same thing over and over again with 10-20% difference in gameplay mechanics (or much less, actually), or who kinda "cheat" by doing half the sidequests in one playthrough, "saving" the rest for the second, etc., but I'm not one of them. The non-linearity often comes at the expense of not telling a coherent story, and random sidequests detached from the main story that you can complete in any order without any urgency ("saving the world can wait; I need to kill some rats in a farmet's basement and deliver 10 sacks of potatos").

So yeah, I could also ask: why wouldn't someone prefer a tighter linear narrative experience vs a sprawling, disconnected array of sidequests and a so-so main quest? But both approaches can result in enjoyable games; they're just different ways to design a game, I don't see one being superior to the other.
 
Last edited:

Baron Tahn

Scholar
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
668
While I cant say I agree with most of the premise here I just wanted to say that games like Quest for Glory are an underutilised niche. I think there is something to be said for leaning into the adventure game side of things but still make a crpg with stats and the like - in some ways the various paths that you could take through the game, with different scenes and puzzle solutions for rogue/fighter/mage/paladin made for better 'branching paths' than we get even nowadays. You could multiclass, transfer character between games, all sorts of stuff.

Wish they made more stuff like that and anyone who enjoys rpgs and adventure games should definately play QFG, especially IV. Honorable mention to Heroine's Quest, which is a free homage to QFG.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
1,261
That's a tryhard opinion piece by Lilura (self-ejected from Codex a while ago)... None of her statements you quoted above make a whole lot of sense to me. What she wrote is a bit like trying to "prove" that a sandwich is better than an ice cream, or something...

For one, almost all cRPGs are combat heavy. For people who really don't like violence in their games, that's a no starter. Then some people are really just into the narrative, the puzzle solving, and marveling at the graphics, and don't care about any sort of combat and stats-based gameplay.

Comparing adventure games to Fallout is just plain silly. Even an average adventure game has far more complex puzzles than the most complex puzzle-heavy cRPG.

I'd say classic adventures and cRPGs tend to have two quite distinct audiences. I like both, so clearly people who enjoy genres both exist, but I'd wager you'll find more people who like either, but not both.

That answers your first two questions. For question three, I don't think you can change them fundamentally without breaking the whole concept of an adventure game.

About replayability, I don't get much enjoyment from replaying RPGs either, especially long ones. The are exceptions, like Age of Decadence, where you can must replay the game multiple times to unlock all possible paths, but in 95% of cRPGs all you get is the battles playing out a bit differently as I see it. In most RPGs it's still the same same map, the same story, the same sidequests, etc., so I'd say 80% of the game is fundamentally unchanged; all you get is slightly different mechanics for achieving the end goals. Plus most C&C stuff doesn't *really* matter in RPGs, so there's that too.

I'm just mentioning this because the non-linearity and replayability angle of RPGs is often vastly exaggerated. Sure, there are special people who like doing the same thing over and over again with 10-20% difference in gameplay mechanics (or much less, actually), or who kinda cheat by doing half the sidequests in one playthrough, "saving" the rest for the second, etc., but I'm not one of them.

See, I don't mind combat in an adventure game, provided it is done well, or the ratio of combat to character/puzzle solving is low. Think of the arcade sequences in Space Quest games, or the cow fighting in MI, or the way the first couple of KQ games had an optional violent solution to a puzzle - that for me works. I feel like adventure games started to go downhill when they became more linear, and more strict with the 'rules.'

One of the most fun adventure games still to this day for me, design flaws and all, is King's Quest V. It's not particularly linear - you can solve most puzzles in any order really - it has the feel of a 'heroes' journey' in structure, and it has a companion (even if he's annoying) so that the experience isn't too lonely. If you combined that, with the more refined structure / better writing of 6, and the multiple endings of that game, and added in multiple solutions to puzzles and optional combat, I'd feel it'd (imo of course) the ultimate adventure game. Add in more optional detailed sidequests, so we're not just going on the main quest.

I've yet to play Fallout (cause I'm an idiot) but I did grow up playing the original BG games - and I feel like there could be a way to hybrid such an experience, with the adventure genre.

What makes CRPG's replayable for me (again of the BG type) is the multiple dialogue options, and the bevy of side quests. Ex, rn I'm on a BG2 run - I'm more than about halfway through as a fighter mage. I'm already looking forward to my next play as a pure mage, and exploring different dialogue options, doing quests I neglected on this run, and other romances.

One thing I do agree with Lilura on this is that (as enjoyable as they are) post Morrowind Elder Scrolls games have increasingly become games for casual gamers, and the extreme commercial success of Oblivion and Skyrim means other studios try to mimick those games' accessibility. You'll never see a game like Baldur's Gate again in terms of depth.

Also, I disagree with her on Diablo 1. It's a fun game, but IMO it's another game that appealed more to mainstream gamers than anyone else. Just click click click on an enemy til it's dead - Very good for the Sega Genesis era of gaming.
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2024
Messages
82
If what you want is mechanics then RPG is a clear winner. If what you want is story and mood, music, etc. then you can get all that from Adventure Games just as well. I kind of agree that RPGs are better and more advanced, but harder and more expensive to make. Smaller companies would have to start with something else.

Also Adventure Games can be great and RPGs can be terrible. So shoving some basic combat in a basic adventure might make it an RPG but it doesn't make it any good. I'd rather play a good Adventure than a weak RPG. Not that I've played one for many years.
 

Darkozric

Arbiter
Edgy
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
1,868
Liluraclown.png
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,768
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
While I cant say I agree with most of the premise here I just wanted to say that games like Quest for Glory are an underutilised niche.
Oh yeah, the QfG series is awesome. Sadly, it's an outlier among adventure games, but I'd say it out-RPGs many RPGs.

Just like Age of Decadence, which is one of my favourite games, the QfG series warrants multiple playthroughs with different character classes. By the way, one similar game is Maniac Mansion where different kids unlock different paths and solutions to the same puzzles, which is great.

There were a few similar but text-based adventure/RPG hybrids in the early 80s. I haven't played any of them yet, but some had interesting mechanics, such as transfering your character between the different modules.
 

Maxie

Wholesome Chungus
Patron
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Messages
8,306
Location
Warszawa, PL
While I cant say I agree with most of the premise here I just wanted to say that games like Quest for Glory are an underutilised niche.
Oh yeah, the QfG series is awesome. Sadly, it's an outlier among adventure games, but I'd say it out-RPGs many RPGs.

Just like Age of Decadence, which is one of my favourite games, the QfG series warrants multiple playthroughs with different character classes. By the way, one similar game is Maniac Mansion where different kids unlock different paths and solutions to the same puzzles, which is great.

There were a few similar but text-based adventure/RPG hybrids in the early 80s. I haven't played any of them yet, but some had interesting mechanics, such as transfering your character between the different modules.
thankfully it's an outlier. you and i both know that QfG, or indeed Heroine's Quest, or even Dreams in the Witch House is a CYOA, and promotes metagaming, rather than actual smarts to beat any puzzles.
the fact that you call AoD one of your favs just outs you as an utter philistine.
 

Maxie

Wholesome Chungus
Patron
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Messages
8,306
Location
Warszawa, PL
and promotes metagaming
So what? Ultimately, games are entertainment, so the question is, do you enjoy such things or not. I enjoy QfG and AoD very much.

rather than actual smarts to beat any puzzles.
Well, I disagree on that.
the most elegant solution to beating a metagaming type game like AoD would be to steal VD's production notes, rather than waste time mapping content gates. moe of a challenge, too.
 

InSight

Learned
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
433
2) Why did adventure games remain popular for a few years even alongside the original Diablo (1996) and Baldur's Gate (1998)?
One is to factor/consider/assess the strength of the genre, what can it do/offer more/better then the other.
Adventure game genre offered the most advanced/better graphics/visuals or capacity for it + situations/format/design in which the player basks/absorbed/immersed in the visual(and its additions, such as music).

There could be action games which are par graphically, but due its design, the player has not time/focus/attention to be simulated by all its visual details which adventure games or as refereed "pixel hunt" necessitates.
Since their main strength is no longer unique for it is found/done better/equivalently in other genre such as Open World.
Open world games also should have the moments of passiveness to observe/enjoy the graphics/scenery that visual Adventure game players should appeal.

Thus, If Adventure were still relatively popular, it because they were better visually, graphically impressive, attractive per the hardware limits available at the time among game genres.

=======
https://calendarforlife.org/blog/it...iolet-radiation-to-color-the-shroud-of-turin/

Most Recent Research Appears to Confirm the Shroud of Turin is the Burial Cloth of Jesus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9lMQlI32wE

https://bibleevidences.com/

https://nutritionfacts.org/

https://theconversation.com/red-meats-a-tasty-treat-but-too-much-can-give-you-cancer-27158
https://youtu.be/uW05Rgqp_jo https://youtu.be/TkcCaHjZ2nA

FROM BABYLON TO AMERICA: THE PROPHECY MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pQvM9ZY41k

True Location of real Jerusalem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJJr8ZM1jj0

TRUE LOCATIONS ANCIENT BABYLON https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rURLiIQlPVU

Megiddo - The March to Armageddon Full Movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUDz96jhAPc

https://odysee.com/@TruthUnveiled777_Mirror:4/The-Pagan-Origins-Of-Islam-1:4

https://odysee.com/@TruthUnveiled77...east-Revealed!-It's-Not-What-You-Think!!!-1:4

Proof Meditation Is Dangerous & Demonic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Sbs0YOGk8

jesustruthdeliverance.com/

https://jesustruthdeliverance.com/?s=yoga
https://www.testofbelievers.com
https://www.yogadangers.com/
https://reasonsforjesus.com/new-study-finds-meditation-is-mentally-emotionally-dangerous/

The Dragon Revealed - Spiritual Dangers Behind Martial Arts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCg93yOaEzA&t=0s
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RyOg7N0IMeKP/

Ex-Jesuit Priest Interview https://www.bitchute.com/video/JHR9jgNLKNMO/

Dragons, Owls, Devils, Sexual and Locust imagery found in the Papal Regalia (Full Documentary)https://www.bitchute.com/video/uUjhfvqfp9no/

Paul a False Prophet, dire warnings from Jesus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFfs1Sac8cU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jVBoPCnQ7c

https://odysee.com/@TruthUnveiled777_Mirror:4/Scriptures-Often-Ignored-Problems-With-Paul-1:0

http://spirituallysmart.com/
https://spirituallysmart.com/nazi.html
https://spirituallysmart.com/alberto.html

Christian Ignorance: The Sin of Eating Blood https://youtu.be/0R5kK-8hiHc?t=797

BLT the Seventh day beavers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrI2dyHp_cI

Sabbath-Keeping Bees & Sabbath Instinct
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyYHG6jsTNY

An Ox RESTS on SATURDAYS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7JsygwssYU

5 Quantum Phenomena Supporting God's Existence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyQW6Jg_6z0


The one only name of the only one true god without equal, none above him and never will be :https://www.bitchute.com/video/D0UmRFfmqF9V/
 
Last edited:

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,343
Adventure games only exist post-Fallout because of ignorance, inertia and the casual demographic that loves on-rails narrative and cinematization.
As much as I'm loath to disagree with Lilura, she's ignoring the best type of adventure games, namely text adventures:

8dZoDvo.png
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom