Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Alpha Protocol decisions, blandness and timers

Ogg

Ogg

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
1,005
Location
River Seine
Codex 2012 Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
sabishii said:
I agree that it would be annoying if you had to read the dialogue choices you're given (as I just saw in a Fahrenheit screenshot). However, in AP all you have to do is appraise the situation and determine the correct "stance" to use, which should turn out pretty reflesive.
Click to expand...

Obviously, you haven't played Fahrenheit (you lucky bastard). You would know that the dialog system was exactly about stances. No written dialogues. At first, I thought "That's something ew. Let's try it. That could be great." But after one or two occurences of these dialogues scenes, I simply thought: immershun-breaking. Not clever, not usable, not even fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom