Jason Liang
Arcane
It always perplexed me that, however similar the Europa Universalis games were to Merchant Prince, Paradox always failed to make trading as intuitive, fun and thematic as it is in Merchant Prince.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Any good to great Age of Sail games?
- Thread starter PorkyThePaladin
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Messages
- 20,351
Victor1234
Educated
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
- Messages
- 255
There was a very interesting article on this topic that I found a lot to agree with. It seems to me that there are certain players that like these sorts of games (Patrician, Port Royale, Merchant Prince, etc) where the goal is make numbers go up and are not so much about trade as they are about making numbers go up.
If you've ever read books like Tai-Pan by James Clavell or Nostromo by Joseph Conrad, there's a certain aspect of trading that I don't think has ever been captured in any game, even though Tai-Pan was one of the first trading video games ever, released in 1979.
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/games-trading
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.