Ezeekiel
Liturgist
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,783
Well, unless you consider 35%/100% vs 40%/150% not "more armor/piercing" damage then yes, greataxes are not better than greatswords against heavily armored enemies.Re weapons discussion:
2H axes split their damage between head and body always, thus the seemingly crazy damage numbers (if you look not at the item but the standard attack skill). They're actually not that great against heavy armor/orc warriors compared to warhammers. I haven't played in a while, but I'm not sure a 2h axe does more armor /piercing damage to, say, the body than a greatsword, or at least not much. Against fully armored opponents (good helmet and body armor) they're meh.
Of curse base damage on axes is slightly lower but then they have the "always also hits head" ability built-in. Overall they are significanly better than greatsword against a single enemy in heavy armor. I don't know where did you get the impression that they aren't. Greatswords are still better overall because of much better attack options.
I considered the %, but wasn't sure how that actually works out because of the split damage. Consider that armor reduces hp dmg by 10%, so 2 pieces of armor hit = 10% each. Does that matter in this equation, or do the damage numbers make up for it?
You might well be right, but I'd love to see the actual numbers. Also not sure if they do critical damage to the head or not, that would change things big time. The dev explained it on the steam forums at some point I believe, when peopel were asking about the headhunter perk. Can't be bothered to search for it now, though.