Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Bearing False Witness in Dragon Age

HanoverF

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
6,083
MCA Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Divinity: Original Sin 2
The important question is will I be able to enslave nations with my bearing of false witness?
 

aries202

Erudite
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,066
Location
Denmark, Europe
First off, I like what I'm reading about this game. And here's why: Six origin stories that will affect your story throughout the game dependent on what you choose to do in these origin stories.
And I hope this means that when the dwarf character in this snippet meets some of the noble's family, they will know what he has ordered - an assination of a citizen that has written some true historic facts about a Paragorn. (which may have shown that he was not as virtous as he probably claimed he was). Note that it was a dwarfen citizeb, who ajust happens to be a noble, not the Paragorn, that was assisanted for writing something -ehm- not praiseworthy of the Paragorn.

I don't think they ripped this off from Age of Decadence; DA: Origins has been under development since at least 2004 when Bioware announced the game; it probably were in pre-production in 2002 or 2003. Back then, it was only known as Dragon Age, though.

I remain cautiously optimistic still about DA: Origins.
 

Shannow

Waster of Time
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,386
Location
Finnegan's Wake
Volourn said:
How many BIO games ahve you played? After all thsoe games, if you feel that BIO hasn't delivered 'tangible consequences' to your 'standards' why are you still expecting them to?
Hope? Evolution? Or simply improving your design? While I'd agree that high expectation on the tangible consequences front might be a little silly, hope is hard to squish.
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,352
thesheeep said:
Tigranes said:
"There's a very strong element of kicking ass, like: Hey, there are things over there with red circles - they will die," says Laidlaw, playfully.

What the fuck? Where do they find people that talk like this? It's like they got Dan Tudge & Company from Disneyland.

What's wrong with that statement?
Not professional enough for you?

It's like the words come together and stand in the right place, but they're all wearing blue thongs and top hats and full of pimples.

Note that it was a dwarfen citizeb, who ajust happens to be a noble, not the Paragorn, that was assisanted for writing something -ehm- not praiseworthy of the Paragorn.

The article says the guy didn't like censorship, so no. It was the noble accuser that he assassinated, not the historian.

Also, does that mean Paragorn will soon become the King of Gondor and lead the armies against the Blight?
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Aries202, I have to remind that this game is being developed by Bioware. Is multiplatform. And being in control of EA.
That's like triple shit cocktail.
 

ArcturusXIV

Cipher
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,894
Location
Innsmouth
This game looks like shit. It is a generic fantasy world, full of cliches (elves, orcs, dwarves). Even the graphics aren't that great when compared to other isometric games like Diablo 3. And dark and gritty is overdone.
 

Korgan

Arbiter
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
4,238
Location
Fahrfromjuden
So "EPIC" really stands for "XTREME" + "NEXT-GEN". Considering how NEXT-GEN the original XTREME was, this may be just enough to make the universe implode.
I really have a hard time believing this. For reals.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
Yeah, because DA will actually have more role-playing, and conseqeunces than BG2 did. Which means it'll actually have more in common with HOTU, JE, and ME.
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Considering that HOTU, JE and ME didn't have any consequences that is certainly an improvement.

But you are right - DA is more like fantasy edition of Mass Effect - same extreme super-agent hero trying to save the world while dropping cheesy one-liners only with top-down perspective added besides third person one. That certainly makes it old-skool.
 

ArcturusXIV

Cipher
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,894
Location
Innsmouth
Using my psychic powers, I will review the game now, giving it a 6/10. I'm pretty certain the story will suck, the combat will be generic, and choices will be meaningless. I don't mean to sound crude, or harsh, but I am, so that's the way it comes out. It's not a matter of whining. It's a matter of pointing out the obvious. Since when has Bioware actually done something with depth? The last game I enjoyed they had a hand in was Baldur's Gate 2, and that was only decent, not great. Nonetheless, I will probably be buying it, if only because there are no RPGs of depth coming out anymore. Which is the exact same reason I buy whatever shit Bethesda shovels down my throat. I'm that bored.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"Using my psychic powers, I will review the game now, giving it a 6/10. I'm pretty certain the story will suck, the combat will be generic, and choices will be meaningless. I don't mean to sound crude, or harsh, but I am, so that's the way it comes out. It's not a matter of whining. It's a matter of pointing out the obvious. Since when has Bioware actually done something with depth? The last game I enjoyed they had a hand in was Baldur's Gate 2, and that was only decent, not great. Nonetheless, I will probably be buying it, if only because there are no RPGs of depth coming out anymore. Which is the exact same reason I buy whatever shit Bethesda shovels down my throat. I'm that bored."

Sarcasm or moronicy?

You decide... with your psyhic powers.... :wink:
 

Worm King

Scholar
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
706
If the character system and combat are fun enough, I can ignore the supposedly stupid setting(I haven't followed much and from what I've seen it all looks pretty good).
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,435
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
I honestly just cannot get excited about this game. Let's see... You are FORCED to join the Grey Wardens..... Didn't they do the same thing in Mass Effect?

Origin Stories: Neat. Though as in true Bioware fashion it will ultimately mean nothing. Maybe some certain lulzy dialogue.

Choice and Consequences: They *might* actually include some game effecting ones. Guess we shall see.

Combat: *seems* interesting.

*twist* on the Fantasy genre: Arcanum did this well. Guess we shall see.

The Rise Of The Ancient Evil: Jebus fucking Christmas. AGAIN? Well at least we are not some spiky haired angsty male with a gravity defying sword.

Anyways, I'm going to sit on the fence and see how this game turns out.
 

wrathofdog

Scholar
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
538
ArcturusXIV said:
This game looks like shit. It is a generic fantasy world, full of cliches (elves, orcs, dwarves). ...

Give me the cliched dwarves and elves over anthropomorphic cats any day.
 

ArcturusXIV

Cipher
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,894
Location
Innsmouth
Volourn said:
"Using my psychic powers, I will review the game now, giving it a 6/10. I'm pretty certain the story will suck, the combat will be generic, and choices will be meaningless. I don't mean to sound crude, or harsh, but I am, so that's the way it comes out. It's not a matter of whining. It's a matter of pointing out the obvious. Since when has Bioware actually done something with depth? The last game I enjoyed they had a hand in was Baldur's Gate 2, and that was only decent, not great. Nonetheless, I will probably be buying it, if only because there are no RPGs of depth coming out anymore. Which is the exact same reason I buy whatever shit Bethesda shovels down my throat. I'm that bored."

Sarcasm or moronicy?

You decide... with your psyhic powers.... :wink:

Neither. Just an angry cunt who can't take a joke.
 

serch

Magister
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
1,392
Location
Behind mistary, in front of conspirancy
Bioware can take risks, NWN toolset was a true innovation and a hell of resources gulper one. Besides, their games are usually, at least, fun, unlike fallout 3 that some seem to enjoy in our very Codex. I don't think that EA's adquisition paints a good future for them, though, this may be their last good game.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom