Mefi said:
But the Total War thing is true. Since Shogun the series has been stinking.
I wouldn't say "stinking" exactly (of Medieval - I haven't played Rome yet), but in many ways I rate Shogun as being a better game than Medieval. Medieval has a lot more factions, more areas, more troop types etc., but that's the major "advantage".
In Shogun I can play through most of the game with things finely balanced (starting from the West, naturally), and will win a few turns after I'm in a commanding position. In Medieval, things can easily turn into a long, drawn out grind, where I'm fairly sure I'll win quite early on, but I need to hack my way through battle after samey battle to explain this to the enemy.
In Shogun, the map is also small enough, with narrow front lines, that one or two battles can easily be pivotal to the entire war - at almost any stage. You can control half the country, and still have everything hang by a thread in each battle as those Hojo bastards throw scores of warrior monks at your archers in Mino.
In Medieval, by the time you control half (or even a third) of the game world, you are probably bored. Each battle doesn't matter too much, since it involves a small part of your front line / army, and any losses can be made up later. The one thing you can be sure of, win or lose, is that there's a long, painful grind ahead.
Total War doesn't have the depth of Civ, so putting things on a Civ-like scale - as in Medieval - just gets boring. Everything is more-of-the-same but with slightly upgraded troops. In Shogun, things don't have the time to stagnate, and individual battles remain important and exciting throughout the game (so long as you're not some kind of Hojo / Uesugi pansy of course).
Medieval also doesn't have the assassination cut-scenes.
For its time, Shogun is undoubtedly the better game. I'd probably say it's better overall too, though some would argue with this (and be wrong
). It's nothing to do with being "mainstream" or otherwise, it's to do with abandoning great balance and pacing for a flawed bigger-is-better approach.