I'm pretty sure both these groups exist. People can be on the same page for multiple reasons.Roguey The problem with SJWs is that they can't seem to decide what they are. Are they elitists, arbiters of good taste who oppose sexualized content in games because it appeals to an uncouth lower class element? (Your use of the term "puerile" suggests this)
Or are they moralists, who wish to purge "offensive" taboo content from the world to protect sensitive minds?
In passing, "pandering" translates to "includes anything other than the usual pandering" in my head by now.
Well, I'm not a programmer, of course, so I rely on various (maybe dubious) sources, but, for example:
Uh, this might actually be true? The VGA Sierra games had 256 color graphics, so "8 bit". I don't know whether their code used 32 bit pointers and integers. Quite possibly not if they worked on 286s.
I believe all or nearly all of the classic sierra adventures were 16 bit games, they never made anything for 8 bit computers, and stopped making adventures around the time the 286 became obsolete. Despite this their games saw great changes in graphics, both technical (from low-rez 16 color to medium-rez 256 color) and artistic (from pixel art to scanned paintings and 3D renders) There's no way you can simply label that as "16 bit style" and have it mean something.
Found a protest site "Rock, Paper, Misogyny" and post these links there. This thread has turned into a generator of its own material.http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/11/25/take-a-bow-ms-male-character-explored/
FFS RPS
Too bad comments are closed it would probably be a gold mine.
Mathemagic. It says "free," it must therefore be more cost effective.100 jetons = 1 euro
300 jetons = 5 euro
hmmm
100 jetons = 1 euro
300 jetons = 5 euro
hmmm
There's something about this guy's writing patterns that I find utterly repulsive.http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/11/25/take-a-bow-ms-male-character-explored/
FFS RPS
Too bad comments are closed it would probably be a gold mine.
I love how "Great Value" is least cost effective optionForza 5 in EU:
![]()
Keep in mind that 16 bit applications run just fine on 32 bit CPUs. People were making 16bit programs as late as Windows 98.I believe all or nearly all of the classic sierra adventures were 16 bit games, they never made anything for 8 bit computers, and stopped making adventures around the time the 286 became obsolete. Despite this their games saw great changes in graphics, both technical (from low-rez 16 color to medium-rez 256 color) and artistic (from pixel art to scanned paintings and 3D renders) There's no way you can simply label that as "16 bit style" and have it mean something.
The 286 was already too slow to run their last batch of adventure games. Actually, GK1 and PQ4 were slow even on 386. If they kept using 16 bit code it must have been a matter of convention/engine limitations.
Isn't the 1EUR=1USD thingie because of Vat?I love how "Great Value" is least cost effective option. But hey what do you expect from "1EUR=1USD" people? Scratch that, what do you expect from "f2p monetization in boxed full price title" people?
Isn't the 1EUR=1USD thingie because of Vat?I love how "Great Value" is least cost effective option. But hey what do you expect from "1EUR=1USD" people? Scratch that, what do you expect from "f2p monetization in boxed full price title" people?
Kids are sexting by the time they're twelve. There are children modeling sexy lingere for kids. Every woman who can afford it gets a breast implant and caps on her teeth to create the illusion of perfection. Girls are competing to wear the sheerest, tightest pants they can possibly find, so that when they bend over you can see their happy little smile from behind. The goal of every woman is to look as absolutely beautiful as she can (even a disgusting whale wants to be a beautiful disgusting whale). Nobody is choosing to look like absolute shit.The problem with SJWs is that they can't seem to decide what they are. Are they elitists, arbiters of good taste who oppose sexualized content in games because it appeals to an uncouth lower class element?
Or are they moralists, who wish to purge "offensive" taboo content from the world to protect sensitive minds?