Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Cleve Blakemore accuses the RPG Codex of bandwidth leeching

Krancor

Scholar
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
115
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
Norfleet said:
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
... but a lot of this comes from watching war movies made after the 1960's. The impression that a well fortified fortress just becomes completely insecure instantly is the stuff of Hollywood fantasy.
Well, yes. But you also have to figure a lot of what you're constructing qualifies as makeshift at best and maintenance is going to be a bit difficult. Some, possibly even most, of that equipment is going to malfunction at some point. I run into this issue all the time, and pretty much design for it.

Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
The insecure position is the guy topside doing the frontal assault. That's the casualties.
You also have to figure that anyone actually planning an assault knows this. Unless they have a really burning need to die in large numbers, they're not going to try that. What are your plans for siege? Assuming your attackers simply lay siege to the place and try to starve you out, how long can you hold out? Do you have a self-perpetuating food source available? Underground water tap? I personally find rats are a good choice. While some people would not care to eat rats, they are actually quite tasty, and are a hardy species that can be raised with little to no maintenance. After all, they *ARE* vermin. Surviving when they AREN'T wanted is second nature to them. It's trivial to keep them alive if you DON'T try to kill them, given how hard it is to eradicate them to begin with. Plus, they eat nearly anything and also function as garbage disposal. But without a source of underground water (and filtration/distillation equipment!), and some indefinitely perpetuating food supply, it is simply a matter of time. Then all this equipment likely requires power to operate: What are you using? Solar? Unreliable. Solar panels have limited maintenance-free lifespans, and tend to break down. Plus, they must be mounted topside, exposing them to hostile fire. Wind? Same problem. Generators? Limited fuel. Your two main options are pretty much either geothermal or RTGs/SRGs. Geothermal is locationally specific, and may require you to drill pretty deep. This is not a bad thing, since embracing the Morlock lifestyle in full will certainly prepare you to survive anything up to and including the theft of the Earth's atmosphere. Working off radioactives, on the other hand, well, really expensive. I hope you have deep pockets if you're going this route. Solar and wind are too exposed and easily damaged in the event of hostile attack, and are not viable for fortified installations.

That all sounds really complicated.

Now, in addition to solar, wind and diesel generator, I have acquired HFC technology. I can store enough fuel cells to keep the shelter humming right through nuclear winter and the ten year cobalt-60 decay cycle.

What I really need but can't get yet is simple nickel-iron ferrite batteries. Incredibly, these are the most expensive components I need and can't get. I have regular gel rechargeables at present and I am not happy about it, because they won't last much beyond 6 years if charged expertly every single cycle. So this remains an area I am working on.

I also want to replace my modern diesel generator with a Lister, again it may take some time before I can get a good one at a decent price.

Either way, I'm pretty certain I could outlast any poor soul aboveground by a couple of decades or so. I don't think it is realistic to believe anyone will camp outside the region and wait most of their adult life for someone to emerge. That's something that won't happen. They'll make a stupid advance, they'll get whacked, then upon the dumb remainder fleeing they will be intercepted and destroyed like rabid dogs.

My silos are abundantly stocked, within and without. I can squeeze a trigger longer than any trespasser can afford to hide behind a stump in the crevass and live off roots and bugs.

I pretty much know what the average citizen is packing in "G" force and needless to say, I'm not worried. If they were smart enough to be dangerous, they'd have built shelters of their own. Pathetic rag-tag scavengers humming and crotch-grabbing while snapping their fingers like Huggy Bear will be even less effective in an emergency than they are now. Everybody is cool according to television and they're all super commandos, but I reckon they'll have a different perspective after a couple days without solid food.

http://www.villagephotos.com/viewpubima ... &selected=

http://www.villagephotos.com/viewpubima ... &selected=

In real life, people aren't so smart. I've never seen these super commandos of which you speak. Although I have seen thousands of desperately confused and deluded metrosexual males who could not successfully conduct observation on the McDonald's takeout window without accidentally crushing their own testicles.

You've already said you would be shooting earlier int he thread. If you are shooting, a sniper can take you out, easily. Even shooting from an enclosure.

You are saying here that you would be defending against some wretched ragtag survivors, but people like that would not survive in the first palce in the scenario you are preparing for. You also live in the middle of nowhere making that unlikely, but other scenarios are not unlikely at all.

The 'scavengers' are going to be military personnel. Either australian or else chinese or even american. They may even have some supposed legal authority to seize the supplies you have, as well.

You might get a few scouts, but after that they will be prepared.

Have you tested all your remote weapon systems thoroughly? I can't imagine someone being superheavyweight boxer super programmer AND master builder and chemist on top of it. And if you're not, you are going to have problems with your supposedly completely automated defenses. It's not exactly the kind of thing you can hire someone from home depot to build for you...
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
Where's this bunker at? Sounds like a nice destination for a road trip...
 

Cleveland Mark Blakemore

Golden Era Games
Übermensch Developer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
11,711
Location
LAND OF THE FREE & HOME OF THE BRAVE
Krancor said:
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
Norfleet said:
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
... but a lot of this comes from watching war movies made after the 1960's. The impression that a well fortified fortress just becomes completely insecure instantly is the stuff of Hollywood fantasy.
Well, yes. But you also have to figure a lot of what you're constructing qualifies as makeshift at best and maintenance is going to be a bit difficult. Some, possibly even most, of that equipment is going to malfunction at some point. I run into this issue all the time, and pretty much design for it.

Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
The insecure position is the guy topside doing the frontal assault. That's the casualties.
You also have to figure that anyone actually planning an assault knows this. Unless they have a really burning need to die in large numbers, they're not going to try that. What are your plans for siege? Assuming your attackers simply lay siege to the place and try to starve you out, how long can you hold out? Do you have a self-perpetuating food source available? Underground water tap? I personally find rats are a good choice. While some people would not care to eat rats, they are actually quite tasty, and are a hardy species that can be raised with little to no maintenance. After all, they *ARE* vermin. Surviving when they AREN'T wanted is second nature to them. It's trivial to keep them alive if you DON'T try to kill them, given how hard it is to eradicate them to begin with. Plus, they eat nearly anything and also function as garbage disposal. But without a source of underground water (and filtration/distillation equipment!), and some indefinitely perpetuating food supply, it is simply a matter of time. Then all this equipment likely requires power to operate: What are you using? Solar? Unreliable. Solar panels have limited maintenance-free lifespans, and tend to break down. Plus, they must be mounted topside, exposing them to hostile fire. Wind? Same problem. Generators? Limited fuel. Your two main options are pretty much either geothermal or RTGs/SRGs. Geothermal is locationally specific, and may require you to drill pretty deep. This is not a bad thing, since embracing the Morlock lifestyle in full will certainly prepare you to survive anything up to and including the theft of the Earth's atmosphere. Working off radioactives, on the other hand, well, really expensive. I hope you have deep pockets if you're going this route. Solar and wind are too exposed and easily damaged in the event of hostile attack, and are not viable for fortified installations.

That all sounds really complicated.

Now, in addition to solar, wind and diesel generator, I have acquired HFC technology. I can store enough fuel cells to keep the shelter humming right through nuclear winter and the ten year cobalt-60 decay cycle.

What I really need but can't get yet is simple nickel-iron ferrite batteries. Incredibly, these are the most expensive components I need and can't get. I have regular gel rechargeables at present and I am not happy about it, because they won't last much beyond 6 years if charged expertly every single cycle. So this remains an area I am working on.

I also want to replace my modern diesel generator with a Lister, again it may take some time before I can get a good one at a decent price.

Either way, I'm pretty certain I could outlast any poor soul aboveground by a couple of decades or so. I don't think it is realistic to believe anyone will camp outside the region and wait most of their adult life for someone to emerge. That's something that won't happen. They'll make a stupid advance, they'll get whacked, then upon the dumb remainder fleeing they will be intercepted and destroyed like rabid dogs.

My silos are abundantly stocked, within and without. I can squeeze a trigger longer than any trespasser can afford to hide behind a stump in the crevass and live off roots and bugs.

I pretty much know what the average citizen is packing in "G" force and needless to say, I'm not worried. If they were smart enough to be dangerous, they'd have built shelters of their own. Pathetic rag-tag scavengers humming and crotch-grabbing while snapping their fingers like Huggy Bear will be even less effective in an emergency than they are now. Everybody is cool according to television and they're all super commandos, but I reckon they'll have a different perspective after a couple days without solid food.

http://www.villagephotos.com/viewpubima ... &selected=

http://www.villagephotos.com/viewpubima ... &selected=

In real life, people aren't so smart. I've never seen these super commandos of which you speak. Although I have seen thousands of desperately confused and deluded metrosexual males who could not successfully conduct observation on the McDonald's takeout window without accidentally crushing their own testicles.

You've already said you would be shooting earlier int he thread. If you are shooting, a sniper can take you out, easily. Even shooting from an enclosure.

You are saying here that you would be defending against some wretched ragtag survivors, but people like that would not survive in the first palce in the scenario you are preparing for. You also live in the middle of nowhere making that unlikely, but other scenarios are not unlikely at all.

The 'scavengers' are going to be military personnel. Either australian or else chinese or even american. They may even have some supposed legal authority to seize the supplies you have, as well.

You might get a few scouts, but after that they will be prepared.

Have you tested all your remote weapon systems thoroughly? I can't imagine someone being superheavyweight boxer super programmer AND master builder and chemist on top of it. And if you're not, you are going to have problems with your supposedly completely automated defenses. It's not exactly the kind of thing you can hire someone from home depot to build for you...

You watch too much television. It shows.
 

User was nabbed fit

Guest
A successful PMC is likely going to make Cleve's bunker into an outlook post for them when the world goes postapocalyptic.
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
Yeah, I think the super paranoid approach he's taking to this is going to be less profitable in the end. I would try to use the bunker as some sort of leverage to gain access to a greater amount of supplies and security. There's definitely not a lot that would prevent them from fucking you over and just taking your stuff, but at least that way you come across as a cooperative local instead of militant insurgent.
 

DefJam101

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
8,047
Location
Cybernegro HQ
Wow.

Not only did this guy manage to derail the thread by talking about his underground fortress, but he couldn't even successfully defend his underground fortress that no one has seen. Even with all of this anecdotal evidence, he still can't even make it sound even close to impenetrable.

Why didn't he just say that it had some sort of advanced shielding or cloaking device? He could've, if he wanted to; we don't know what is in that "fortress". Honestly, it's better to say that and have people not be able to prove you wrong than to bring up all this bullshit about napalm flooding canyons and 24/7 snipers covering a position that somehow blends into the environment. At least then you just look like an idiot who made shit up,, rather than an idiot who made shit up that belongs in a fucking James Bond film.
 

Cleveland Mark Blakemore

Golden Era Games
Übermensch Developer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
11,711
Location
LAND OF THE FREE & HOME OF THE BRAVE
Kaiserin said:
Yeah, I think the super paranoid approach he's taking to this is going to be less profitable in the end. I would try to use the bunker as some sort of leverage to gain access to a greater amount of supplies and security. There's definitely not a lot that would prevent them from fucking you over and just taking your stuff, but at least that way you come across as a cooperative local instead of militant insurgent.

I'm counting on attackers to be no brighter than this guy. Dudes like this will just pile up, one metrosexual consumer unit after another, each of them raised on FPS shooters who have no idea what combat in real life is actually like.

I love these scenarios of armies of super commandos with infinity lives, ammo and fuel who just keep coming like a respawn point, over and over again.

"There's definitely not a lot that would prevent them from fucking you over and just taking your stuff" (BANG) (Kaiserin plows dirt row with nose)

My real worry is corpse disposal. I could just keep filling the ravine until I can pave the surface with concrete and drive over it as a land bridge to the other side.
 

Cleveland Mark Blakemore

Golden Era Games
Übermensch Developer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
11,711
Location
LAND OF THE FREE & HOME OF THE BRAVE
DefJam101 said:
Wow.

Not only did this guy manage to derail the thread by talking about his underground fortress, but he couldn't even successfully defend his underground fortress that no one has seen. Even with all of this anecdotal evidence, he still can't even make it sound even close to impenetrable.

Why didn't he just say that it had some sort of advanced shielding or cloaking device? He could've, if he wanted to; we don't know what is in that "fortress". Honestly, it's better to say that and have people not be able to prove you wrong than to bring up all this bullshit about napalm flooding canyons and 24/7 snipers covering a position that somehow blends into the environment. At least then you just look like an idiot who made shit up,, rather than an idiot who made shit up that belongs in a fucking James Bond film.

You watch too much television. It shows.
 

DefJam101

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
8,047
Location
Cybernegro HQ
I don't even own a TV.

1180993442620rk0hs4.gif
 

User was nabbed fit

Guest
Cleve said:
I'm counting on attackers to be no brighter than this guy. Dudes like this will just pile up, one metrosexual consumer unit after another, each of them raised on FPS shooters who have no idea what combat in real life is actually like.

Unfortunately, Cleve, it's likely that they won't all be dumb. Especially since only the strongest will survive. Eventually some of those strongest could come your way.

Cleve said:
each of them raised on FPS shooters who have no idea what combat in real life is actually like.

As opposed to you, amirite?
 

Unradscorpion

Arbiter
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
1,488
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
I'm counting on attackers to be no brighter than this guy. Dudes like this will just pile up, one metrosexual consumer unit after another, each of them raised on FPS shooters who have no idea what combat in real life is actually like..

Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
It's these kinds of brilliant strategists I am expecting to compose the brunt of the assault force on my position.

Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
Since there are six rings of defense possible around the shelter, this is the kind of guy I would just expect to find dead on the perimeter while I am out trimming the hedges. My strategy assumes a native intelligence equivalent to this rocket scientist

Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:
... and all of my planning hinges on any attacker being no brighter than this dude. This is approximately what I expect. I reckon people like this would not get beyond perimeter one..

Yeah, that's one hell of a plan, expecting random people from the Internet with no war experience to come charging at a fortified position with barbed wire, sentry guns and napalm flood system ala Boatmurdered.
Because every single person on the world is as smart as these guys.
 

dagorkan

Arbiter
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
5,164
Though I agree about the wannabe FPS-playing metrosexuals, 50Cent would know how to deal with your bunker, he would just run through a gat in each hand your bullets bouncing off him, jumping over landmines and dodging all your traps. I think he is the kind of guy who'd survive the apocalypse. Have you got a plan to deal with him?
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
I'm counting on attackers to be no brighter than this guy. Dudes like this will just pile up, one metrosexual consumer unit after another, each of them raised on FPS shooters who have no idea what combat in real life is actually like.

How does negotiating with the military or a PMC = brainwashed by FPS games? I don't recall that many FPS games where you negotiate the use of your bunker in exchange for supplies and protection.

It wouldn't take an infinite respawning group of super commandos either. I'm actually thinking more along the lines of a single standard forces rank & file infantry company, that's if I give you a lot of credit. Are you seriously just that clueless to think that large groups of trained and organized people with better equipment than you aren't going to be able to dig you out of that little dugout of yours?

What real life symmetrical combat experience have you had Cleve? Are you guys even allowed to own assault rifles in that socialist sand hole? Are you gonna be able to keep your fat ass from eating too many rations anyway? You're a real ubermensch there Cleve...
 

luckyb0y

Scholar
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
355
Didn't you know? Cleve is super commando, bunker building, military tactics expert. How do you plan to take him on? He's a fucking one man army with titanium bones and super strength. Even Chuck Norris has nothing on Cleve.

EDIT Shit I forgot to add he's also a genius with IQ like billion or something.
 

Jasede

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
24,793
Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Codex Year of the Donut I'm very into cock and ball torture
Yes, he has a high IQ and hence it is reasonable to assume that, knowing he is well-read, he is versed in tactics.

You could check his military records if you really need confirmation.

Several tidbits:
-he ran 2 miles in 9:40-9:50 in 1981-1985
-140 pushups in two minutes in the United States All-Army Ironman Competition at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1985 and 306
situps in two minutes.

His 2-mile running times have been printed in Stars&Stripes and has been serving as Specialist Cleveland Mark Blakemore in Fort Riley Kansas 1983-1985.

Allegedly, there is an article in The Soldier for August 1985 in Fort Riley, Kansas
entitled "Human Fly climbs 25 meters in 20 seconds." picturing him in a very daring and never repeated feat of climbing.

There are some more articles, but it's tiresome.
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
This is probably the best deal on a high resolution graphic LCD on the web. There is a space for a backlight electroluminescent strip behind the screen! In addition to 256x128 pixel resolution, the board has it's own character rom and 1330 interface that makes programming with it pretty easy. With a little work, it is possible to get bitmapped images, custom fonts and bar graphs running on this screen. I have been using it with the display drivers for the RABBIT 2000 embedded system and it only took a bit of tweaking to get a nice looking GUI complete with borders and buttons running on the screen.
http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/c ... review=all

Hey, at least he knows how to find a deal guys.
 

DefJam101

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
8,047
Location
Cybernegro HQ
Jasede said:
Yes, he has a high IQ and hence it is reasonable to assume that, knowing he is well-read, he is versed in tactics.

You could check his military records if you really need confirmation.

Several tidbits:
-he ran 2 miles in 9:40-9:50 in 1981-1985
-40 pushups in two minutes in the United States All-Army Ironman Competition at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1985 and 306
situps in two minutes.

His 2-mile running times have been printed in Stars&Stripes and has been serving as Specialist Cleveland Mark Blakemore in Fort Riley Kansas 1983-1985.

Allegedly, there is an article in The Soldier for August 1985 in Fort Riley, Kansas
entitled "Human Fly climbs 25 meters in 20 seconds." picturing him in a very daring and never repeated feat of climbing.

There are some more articles, but it's tiresome.

How exactly does this help him defend his hypothetical position, again? If he was versed in tactics he either didn't understand a single thing he read or is just making shit up. Everything he has suggested outside of making his fortress not easily noticed (which won't work with all these external security measures, as has already been established) has been a completely idiotic and impractical idea that sounds ripped out of some James Bond film. He doesn't understand the concept of things requiring maintenance and not working, or just hopes other people won't notice.

-And he can say whatever he wants about this thing, why he couldn't come up with better security measures to lie about I do not know. Once again, he could've easily said that he invented some sort of energy shield out of soup cans and a car battery and looked less idiotic than he does now.
 

luckyb0y

Scholar
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
355
Jasede said:
40 pushups in two minutes in the United States All-Army Ironman Competition at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1985

I'm sure that is a typo. I must have been at least 120. 40 is lame - any reasonably fit person would do it. Please stop spreading filthy lies to discredit Cleve and edit your post accordingly. That means now, son.
 

Jasede

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
24,793
Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Codex Year of the Donut I'm very into cock and ball torture
It was indeed a typo. I fixed it.
And you were correct, it was more than 120 - it was 140 under strict conditions and supervision.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom