Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.

Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is the RPG Codex

Donate to Codex

New posts

Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Development Info Cyclopean Dev Update

Thread starter VentilatorOfDoom
Start date Mar 29, 2010

DraQ

Arcane

Mar 30, 2010

#26

Darth Roxor said:
TalesfromtheCrypt said:

Jarl was bitching in the other thread about the fact that nobody is posting here.

I'm just posting to shut him up.

Click to expand...

*jumps the bandwagon*

.

They are nice, but not really anything comment (or fap) worthy.

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio

Developer

Mar 30, 2010

#27

Cassidy said:
It's better to focus completely over the development of one game at a time, specially for a small indie studio. The time spent doing such renders could've been dedicated to Age of Decadence's development, for example.

Just my 2 cents.

Different teams.

You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.

Top Bottom