Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview David Gaider Interview Part II

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND COHESION, DEVELOPER MISTAKES AND LAZINESS"

Cohesion? It's a fuckin' book for fuck sakes that mean shsit.

Developer mistakes? There was no fuckin' mistake. It was a purposefully done design decision.

Laziness? Not laziness to make the agme the way you want to.

FFS BUTTHURT OVER A FUCKIN' BOOK. FFS NERDRAGEEEEEEEEE!
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,730
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
Good to know that for Bio the books about the game are unimportant shit and the readers are fangirls. Tells a lot about how much they care about basic consistency ("lol who cares, he must look cool in the game")

Hmmm-hmm

But I agree with Volly on one thing: It wasn't a mistake, it was a deliberate disregard.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom