Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Do you play more female characters or male ones, and why?

mastroego

mastroego

Arcane
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
10,409
Location
Italy
I'm not sure if this would even be relevant in a gaming world with no "romances".
Of course if you're interested in a "romance" (whatever that means) in a game, then you'd "identify" (whatever that means) with the character, and proceed to "romance" (whatever that means) some character you like.
Of course I've always found this utterly idiotic ever since the trend started.

Luckily you can still play as Deirdre in SMAC, as Lara in Tomb Raider, or even as Linn Kurosawa in the Alien vs Predator arcade, and just enjoy the ladies doing their thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom