Johannes
Arcane
Playing of the shitty game does not have to be fun, the reward stands at the end when you can bash it with passion on the 'dex.
Amount of hours spend on doing something has nothing to do with something being fun.
This works to everything games, movies, music, life, shitting etc.
I personally have 370h in Skyrim and yet i think vanilla skyrim is a shit game.
I played around 120h of Diablo3 and it is shit game
I played around 30h Planescape Torment and it is one of the best games i have ever played.
True. But 120 hours? The player must be retarded, unless the game is like 300 hours long and runs out of ideas 100 hours in.Also some games need a significant amount of time to notice the repetitiveness of its content, some more to be sure of it, and an additionnal amount to decide enough is enough and uninstall the crap.
Do you know any flawless game?
Monkey Island 1
Monkey Island 2
Indy4
DooM
Tie Fighter
Gothic 2.5
CoD4
Diablo
Rome: Total War
Terraria
Broforce
Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
Ultima IV
Just off the top of my head...
Jesus christ.
This fucking thread.
The decline of the codex is real. . .
if jools doesn't get banned for this fucking shit:
Do you know any flawless game?
Monkey Island 1
Monkey Island 2
Indy4
DooM
Tie Fighter
Gothic 2.5
CoD4
Diablo
Rome: Total War
Terraria
Broforce
Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
Ultima IV
Just off the top of my head...
How can we stand for this, and call ourselves MEN?!
Jesus christ.
How can we stand for this, and call ourselves MEN?!
Am I banned now?
FNV, awful? How about I break your head, kiddo? FNV is better than F2.
Does a life really "suck" if you spend 40 years on it?
I
Quitting life may be accompanied by pain and hellish punishment, while quitting a game may be accompanied by a sense of relief. So the fear of the unknown makes you suck up the suck of life.
Now now, there is the possibility of the game having a bunch of sex mods, so one must always factor in the powerful third choice that is the masturbatory option adding a bunch of hours.Just been thinking. A lot of people are shitting on AAA titles like DA:I, Skyrim, et cetera despite having obviously played them for a billion hours. Many people who shit on F:NV here have played it for more hours than F2. I get that those games from a design perspective are really awful, and certainly, the fact you spent 100 hours on Skyrim doesn't mean you think it's time well-spent or necessitates that Skyrim is a *good* game, but can you really say a game you spent 100 hours on *sucks*? At the very least it succeeded in sucking you in to play for that long. Seems hypocritical to me, idk.
Also I've been recommended to post this picture here.
If you spend 100+ hours on a game, you either enjoy it a lot or you're a masochist, there's no middle ground really (no matter what sort of lies you write on the forum afterwards for KKK). Now whether it sucks is a different question entirely, many games can be mediocre to terrible in most areas but have that one thing that keeps you glued on (great mechanics, writing, exploration, graphics, C&C etc.), a lot of it depends on your taste/preference obviously (or even your current mood).
But... what proof do I really have that quitting my FF XIII play through won't initiate the apocalypse?