murloc_gypsy
Cipher
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 323
Day 1 Purchase torrenting
Well, that's offtopic, of course, but there was quite a few people, even women, who defended this atrocity.To be fair, I've never met anyone who would defend female genital mutilation.
So according to those African feminists it's better to have your vagina mutilated than to have your opinion match those of the former colonial forces?
Oh for fuck's sake...
Face looks too masculine to be a Biowhore.Look what twitter got us, a perfect portait of an average bioware product consumer
I don't know about that, the image captures the retardation but not the degeneracy,Look what twitter got us, a perfect portait of an average bioware product consumer
P.S. Nevertheless, this retarded dwarf, Sandal, was one of the few characters in Dragon Age series, that Bioware managed to fuel with some personality, even with only a few lines.
Face looks too masculine to be a Biowhore.Look what twitter got us, a perfect portait of an average bioware product consumer
There, added a body pillow of Garrus in the image, that should convey the nature of the Biodrone better, now he looks retarded and degenerate... but even then I do not feel like it is enough.
That said, nice to know about the crafting video tommorow, I can't wait to see how badly they botched it.
And no-one has heard of Eric Silverman or Sylvia Tamale, because they are batshit crazy. You will always find batshit crazy.Well, that's offtopic, of course, but there was quite a few people, even women, who defended this atrocity.To be fair, I've never met anyone who would defend female genital mutilation.
Tolerance versus human rights
Anthropologist Eric Silverman writes that FGM is one of the "central moral topics of contemporary anthropology." Anthropologists have accused FGM eradicationists of cultural colonialism; they, in turn, have been criticized for their cultural and moral relativism toward FGM, and a failure to defend the idea of universal human rights.[177] The debate highlights a tension between anthropology and feminism, with the former's focus on tolerance and the latter's on rights for all women, raising questions about the extent to which an embrace of multiculturalism implies that different standards ought to apply to African women. The French Association of Anthropologists accused feminists, in 1981, of reviving "the moralistic arrogance of yesterday's colonialism."[178]
Anthropologists challenging the opposition to FGM include Richard Shweder, Janice Boddy, Carla Obermeyer, Ellen Gruenbaum and Fuambai Ahmadu, who was cut as an adult during a Sande society initiation in Sierra Leone.[180] Shweder argues against the idea of universal human rights, but maintains that if a rights perspective is adopted, it must take other rights into account, such as the right of African women to self-determination and freedom of religion.[181]
Ugandan law professor Sylvia Tamale writes that early Western opposition to FGM stemmed from a Judeo-Christian judgment that African sexual culture, including not only FGM but also dry sex, polygyny and levirate marriage, was primitive and required correction. She cautions that, while African feminists "do not condone the negative aspects of the practice, they take strong exception to the imperialist, racist and dehumanising infantilization of African women," inherent in much of the opposition.[182] A common trope in the literature about FGM, according to Christine J. Walley, is to present African women as "mentally castrated," participating in their own oppression and destruction as a result of false consciousness. Fran Hosken and the American feminist Mary Daly both promoted that position in the 1970s.[183]
As an example of the disrespect, historian Chima Korieh cites the publication by 12 American newspapers of the FGM ceremony of a 16-year-old girl in Kenya in 1996. The photographs won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography, but according to Korieh the girl had not given permission for the images to be published or even taken.[184]
One of the areas of dispute is whether the medical evidence supports that FGM is invariably harmful. Shweder argues that it does not, citing reviews of the medical literature by epidemiologist Carla Obermeyer, who suggested in 1999 and 2003 that serious complications are the exception.[185] Gerry Mackie disputed Obermeyer's findings.[186] Shweder also cites a 2001 study by Linda Morison of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine that looked at the reproductive health consequences of Type II FGM in the Gambia; Morison concluded that there were few differences between the circumcised and uncircumcised women.[187]
And no-one has heard of Eric Silverman or Sylvia Tamale, because they are batshit crazy. You will always find batshit crazy.Well, that's offtopic, of course, but there was quite a few people, even women, who defended this atrocity.To be fair, I've never met anyone who would defend female genital mutilation.
Tolerance versus human rights
Anthropologist Eric Silverman writes that FGM is one of the "central moral topics of contemporary anthropology." Anthropologists have accused FGM eradicationists of cultural colonialism; they, in turn, have been criticized for their cultural and moral relativism toward FGM, and a failure to defend the idea of universal human rights.[177] The debate highlights a tension between anthropology and feminism, with the former's focus on tolerance and the latter's on rights for all women, raising questions about the extent to which an embrace of multiculturalism implies that different standards ought to apply to African women. The French Association of Anthropologists accused feminists, in 1981, of reviving "the moralistic arrogance of yesterday's colonialism."[178]
Anthropologists challenging the opposition to FGM include Richard Shweder, Janice Boddy, Carla Obermeyer, Ellen Gruenbaum and Fuambai Ahmadu, who was cut as an adult during a Sande society initiation in Sierra Leone.[180] Shweder argues against the idea of universal human rights, but maintains that if a rights perspective is adopted, it must take other rights into account, such as the right of African women to self-determination and freedom of religion.[181]
Ugandan law professor Sylvia Tamale writes that early Western opposition to FGM stemmed from a Judeo-Christian judgment that African sexual culture, including not only FGM but also dry sex, polygyny and levirate marriage, was primitive and required correction. She cautions that, while African feminists "do not condone the negative aspects of the practice, they take strong exception to the imperialist, racist and dehumanising infantilization of African women," inherent in much of the opposition.[182] A common trope in the literature about FGM, according to Christine J. Walley, is to present African women as "mentally castrated," participating in their own oppression and destruction as a result of false consciousness. Fran Hosken and the American feminist Mary Daly both promoted that position in the 1970s.[183]
As an example of the disrespect, historian Chima Korieh cites the publication by 12 American newspapers of the FGM ceremony of a 16-year-old girl in Kenya in 1996. The photographs won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography, but according to Korieh the girl had not given permission for the images to be published or even taken.[184]
One of the areas of dispute is whether the medical evidence supports that FGM is invariably harmful. Shweder argues that it does not, citing reviews of the medical literature by epidemiologist Carla Obermeyer, who suggested in 1999 and 2003 that serious complications are the exception.[185] Gerry Mackie disputed Obermeyer's findings.[186] Shweder also cites a 2001 study by Linda Morison of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine that looked at the reproductive health consequences of Type II FGM in the Gambia; Morison concluded that there were few differences between the circumcised and uncircumcised women.[187]
and grenades full of bees
that smile on elementalist
and grenades full of bees
Look what twitter got us, a perfect portait of an average bioware product consumer
Define "good"? Another million dollar dumbed down shitty console action game?
Both games are shitty dumbed down console action games, how can one or the other be "Good".
Wow, these are amazing. Such a shame theyre being squandered on a turd like DA3.