- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,631
I don't give a shit about hating on Fallout 3. I've played the game, and it doesn't make this sort of setting detail explicit, at all. From all appearances, Bethesda created their game this way because "that's how a post-apocalypse is, amirite?". There's no indication that any thought went into it, or that they were purposely trying to differentiate the Capital Wasteland from the more civilized West Coast region.
All that stuff about "lots of tactical nukes landed on DC, but fewer larger nukes landed on the West Coast, hence the difference!!" is just fan speculation.
Pretty much.
The Brotherhood in FO3 does make comments about the East Coast being worse off, IIRC, but they never explain why that is, if it even needs an explanation. In New Vegas Obsidian did explain that House blocked most of the missiles though.
There are a few tantalizing setting details that FO3 drops on you, but they never come together as a coherent whole. It's really quite frustrating.
For example, there's talk about how the Brotherhood exterminated a bunch of evil tribals in the Pitt area on their way to the Capital Wasteland, and about the mysterious super mutant infestation in DC (which never receives a satisfying conclusion or explanation).
In the end, you hear President Eden preaching on his radio channel, and you wonder "Who the hell is this guy talking to? NOBODY LIVES IN THIS GOD FORSAKEN LAND! There's no organized society here for you to make your appeal to and recruit to your cause, just a bunch of scattered yokels!" (and he ends up wanting to kill them all anyway, lol)