Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Japan will make the first videogame to make use of this.

J1M

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
14,655
Zinc said:
dagorkan said:
Ogg said:
David Cage's Heavy Rain gave me more thrill than this "oh so perfect" technology. (I'm only talking about graphics here since we don't know much about this game other than its predecessor sucks)
That one's extremely bizarre too.

times comments said:
"Why would you want to create a computer-generated photo-realistic animation of a person when you could just film the real thing against a green screen?"

Have you ever seen green screening in games? It looks awful. And it's impractical. If we never pushed mocap forward, we'd still be playing Pong.

Rob, Dallastown, USA
LOLz. Even creepier seeing the interest this shit stirs up. Given the choice I would prefer human every time, who wants this kind of future?

It doesn't bother me really. A computer-generated female would probably have more personality than most real females anyway.

/sexist
Man has a point.
 

spiwak

Novice
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
94
Ogg said:
David Cage's Heavy Rain gave me more thrill than this "oh so perfect" technology. (I'm only talking about graphics here since we don't know much about this game other than its predecessor sucks)
I always thought the animation in Heavy Rain lacking quite a bit too, especially in the mouth area.

I think they should just forget about this ridiculous realism, at least until they ahve the technology to really do it well. I think people will be more creeped out than anything by human likeness...imagine killing that in a video game.
 

Sitra Achara

Arcane
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
1,859
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
I'm with mu on this. What the fuck are you guys talking about?

Also, the point isn't to accurately depict reality, but rather to accurately depict a photoshopped reality. Can't say I object, tbh. (needs moar bloom)
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
Zinc said:
Her eyes and mouth look weird. And not weird as in, ugly-weird. Inhumanly weird. Disappointing.
I agree, it looks good until you look at the parts of the face that actually matter.
 

bossjimbob

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
225
Very impressive, but I'd have to see a full-screen HD version to really give an honest opinion.
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
The march towards ever more frightening and disturbing porn continues. It shouldn't be long before we see this level of realism in games then.
 

ushdugery

Scholar
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
371
I don't mind it'll keep gettting better until graphics are so good no one cares about them getting much better any more and we can properly focus on gameplay
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
So I've heard. It's going to be a long winter though.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
1,246
ushdugery said:
I don't mind it'll keep gettting better until graphics are so good no one cares about them getting much better any more and we can properly focus on gameplay
By then the graphics will be so expensive that gameplay will be entirely removed.

on topic:
uncanny valley
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom