Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

New pics of Supermutant-orcs came to the surface

larpingdude14

Scholar
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
631
Fortunately i never played Fallout so i think they look awsome.
 

Morbus

Scholar
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
403
larpingdude14 said:
Fortunately i never played Fallout so i think they look awsome.
Yeah, because Fallout is a mythological device of enlightenment that enables you to see things clearly. And I bet you played Oblivion and loved it, because oblivion is a demoniacal device of hatred and sorrow that clouds the mind.

Also, learn 2 rite!1
 

Tails

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,674
larpingdude14 said:
Fortunately i never played Fallout so i think they look awsome.
So you don't know what is real cRPG... and those screens most look badly and boring.
 

Sovard

Sovereign of CDS
Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Messages
920
My, my! What good oral hygiene they have!
You have killed a Super Mutant!!11

You have looted a tube of Crest from the corpse of the Super Mutant.

Would you like to load it in your Rock-It Launcher?


sigh...
 

aries202

Erudite
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
1,066
Location
Denmark, Europe
Oh why, oh oh why --- does there have to be so much bloom today in videogames? I thought the whole idea of Fallout's world was to make a dark, sinister and gritty world&landscape, not make the landscape into some cleartype thing...

Oh, and the lump the brahmin has under its belly probably is the udder - but I think you, clever as you all here, probably guessed that one ;)
But for a mutated cow, the picture really doesn't do mutated cows honour at all, I think. If I'm not too mistaken the mutated cow originally were a Texas Longhorn Cattle? - the big question is what in the world Texas Longhorn Cattle are doing so far north as Washington D.C. - if indeed it is, Texas Longhorn...

The screenshots don't look too bad, but they don't look to good either. They just look sort of bland, meh, and medio-ocre. As for the Behemoth I think that the old shiny metal robot behemoth from Fallout Tactics that Brother None linked to in another thread looked much much better than this super-orcish ogre that Bethesda has come up with to be put into their new Fallout 3 game.
 

Koby

Scholar
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
356
aries202 said:
Oh why, oh oh why --- does there have to be so much bloom today in videogames?

This is what I wanted to say in the thread: Gamespot gives 3.5 for "dumbing down"

FrancoTAU said:
Maybe it just sucks that bad where they couldn't even ignore it.
I was thinking more in the line of: "the graphic and immersion are not good enough to cover up the other flews, we don't mind dumb_down / same_as_prequel / same_as_others as long as they melt our eyeballs. Impress us with next-gen graphics and we can look away (pun intended) when we encounter other bad things, melt our eyeballs and we won't just look away, we'll wouldn’t give a damn".

I could be wrong though, did any game with next-gen graphics managed to score this bad?

I think it is more appropriate here. :wink:
 

OccupatedVoid

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
1,846
Location
East Texas
Bethesda's bloom makes their games look UN-realistic to me. Those screenshots look like I'm playing a game where I'm stoned AND drunk off my ass.
 

Herbert West

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
1,293
OccupatedVoid said:
Bethesda's bloom makes their games look UN-realistic to me. Those screenshots look like I'm playing a game where I'm stoned AND drunk off my ass.

Bloom was ok for the fairy tale aesthetics of Oblivion. It is not anywhere near ok for FO3...
 

Tex

Novice
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
9
aries202 said:
Oh, and the lump the brahmin has under its belly probably is the udder

Either that, or it's a brahmin bull...
 

kris

Arcane
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
8,890
Location
Lulea, Sweden
the_Consumer said:
It takes 5 nukes to kill him, but he shields himself with a car door. Yes, the problem really is with the new perspective, and the lack of tb combat.

Maybe it is the door from the nuclear safe phone booth?
 

Naked Ninja

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,664
Location
South Africa
Hmm, those pics actually look pretty decent, particularly the brahmin. And the bloom looks fine to me because I expect a post nuke world to look likea blasted wasteland where the sky is almost too bright and hurts my vault-raised eyes.

The real question though is whether the brahmins weird mutant udder is milkable for irradiated milk?

I WANT FULL INTERACTIVITY BETHESDA.
 

Tails

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,674
Naked Ninja said:
I WANT FULL INTERACTIVITY BETHESDA.
You can get only full interactivity BY Bethesda - that means none.
Wondering if in FO3 will be owned furniture like in Oblivion - loving this screen.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom